I see you are being careful with your replies this time - usually its a straight "nonsense" without checking facts.Which MP's?
Last edited:
I see you are being careful with your replies this time - usually its a straight "nonsense" without checking facts.Which MP's?
And you are being careful with your answers. How many/which MP's is it?I see you are being careful with your replies this time
Don't believe me ?And you are being careful with your answers. How many/which MP's is it?
Yes. Which ones?Don't believe me ?
Which MPs?At least MPs are now starting to think the Health Secretary is withholding data that could link the vax to excess deaths
Don't believe me ?
They are not making enough noise or getting attention for it if that's the case.At least MPs are now starting to think the Health Secretary is withholding data that could link the vax to excess deaths
Why is your default position on this matter always -to first deny then debunk then deflect.Yes. Which ones?
Which MPs?At least MPs are now starting to think the Health Secretary is withholding data that could link the vax to excess deaths
Deflect he says.Which MPs?
Right on cue - predictableThey are not making enough noise or getting attention for it if that's the case. Here's the deny
Supporting the vaccine (with all the issues it was bound to have), doesn't mean problems should be ignored or covered up. Here's the debunk
But nor should it be made out that there is a major worldwide conspiracy in action here's the deflection
I've been asking since 11pm yesterday. So far all I've seen from him is trolling.Deflect he says.
No deny.Right on cue - predictable
Why is your default position on this matter always -to first deny then debunk then deflect.