- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,625
- Reaction score
- 2,338
- Country
Put it another way. 98.95%, of members of Parliament fail to support call for more information over covid vaccines.So these 10,...... clueless and irrelevant?
Put it another way. 98.95%, of members of Parliament fail to support call for more information over covid vaccines.So these 10,...... clueless and irrelevant?
I'd take the word of Graham Stringer over all those two bit part players climbing the greasy pole.Put it another way. 98.95%, of members of Parliament fail to support call for more information over covid vaccines.
Nothing apparantlyI wonder what aveatry has to say about this.
And that says what exactly?“There is no robust scientific evidence that gives even a vague suggestion of the vaccines causing more harm than they are preventing.
There were control groups in all the studies.I took the decision that as there had been no control group research done, I trusted my immune system more than a cocktail of jabs...
We know two people with 'long covid' symptoms who caught it in the early stages of the pandemic so obviously were not vaccinated. My mates wife, lungs now fùcked and Mrs Motties friends husband, lungs and brain now fùcked. Both were fit and healthy before they caught it. They are the only unvaccinated people we personally knew who had caught it. We know probably 20 times more people who had been vaccinated, caught it and suffered no long covid symptoms.But as with 'long covid' apparently accepted as a non specific illness, only time will tell (along with proper research) as to the true downsides of the jabs...
It says that figures are being investigated and looked at. We should all be pleased with that.And that says what exactly?
We know probably 20 times more people who had been vaccinated, caught it and suffered no long covid symptoms.
Usual nonsense.And that says what exactly?
I'm certainly not suggesting that the harm (that we currently know about) from the various jabs outweighs the possible benefits...
But as with 'long covid' apparently accepted as a non specific illness, only time will tell (along with proper research) as to the true downsides of the jabs...
Now I daresay that if the jabs were causing more harm than good, many would rethink whether they took whatever they were told to take...
But what percentage level would actually make you step back and think about it?
1%, 5%, 10%, 20% etc?
I took the decision that as there had been no control group research done, I trusted my immune system more than a cocktail of jabs...
Never got ill (as was the case with virtually everyone I spoke to) and I certainly mingled with others when allowed to do so...
So what odds would you put on that?
It doesn't protect you from delusionFun Fact #13 - drinking the Kool Ayd will protect you from Covid...
Probably.
UK (suspected) death rates V's covid jabs administered = 0.0000027273%.But what percentage level would actually make you step back and think about it?
1%, 5%, 10%, 20% etc?
Really! What a stupid commentI reckon I could take a jab a day and not give a chuff.