It must be more than just the nosing nib if the steel bar has been cut surely?Well if its just part of the nosing nib and not structural in either bending or shear I would have to agree none and as stated,
It must be more than just the nosing nib if the steel bar has been cut surely?Well if its just part of the nosing nib and not structural in either bending or shear I would have to agree none and as stated,
Can I ask what a projecting nib is just to clarify?Hard to tell from the pic but woody seems to think it is. Does the beam ( as that what it looks like) support bwk directly above it i.e. there isn't a projecting nib as such.
The beam actually continues all the way along the semi detached through to the very end of next door's house. All the way along the semi detached structure.If its any consolation at least its not in the middle of the beam where the BM would be at its greatest
In that case I think we can safely say the structural integrity of the beam has been compromise but to what extent and to what effect is open to debate. Go with test of time, FoS involved and probably over designed in the 1st placeCan I ask what a projecting nib is just to clarify?
If it means some of the concrete which forms part of the lintel sticks out/protrudes from the wall somewhat then yes this is the case. Probably an inch or more sticks out and from the underside where the lintel is good and not been touched, and there is a slight groove under the whole length just inside the underside edge.
However the steel rod from what I can see is not within the nib part but sits just inside the part which would support the bricks.
I would think it's supporting the bricks above certainly the outer skin, possibly the inner skin and maybe the first floor level above too depending where the weight of the floor beams is directed? Not sure if some of the roof weight could being directed towards the front and rear walls of the house or whether this would all be directed towards the side walls?
Thanks. Out of interest what is the difference between a slab and a beam?It's a slab, not a beam and damage to small local areas do not affect the performance as a whole.
After more than 30 years, what signs of movement are there to the rest of the slab and the wall above?
None? Then just patch it a previous post and move on.
The outer wall does not support the floor or roof, that is all done by the inner wall, and the damage to the beam is nowhere near it.
The outer is just a weatherproof skin, it only has to hold itself up. Remember that the bricks aren't made of jelly, they can support themselves to a degree. If you completely removed all support under that corner then perhaps 3 bricks would fall out, the interlocking bricks above would hold the rest.
Very informative, thanks. I wonder if that's why it does seem to be proving the test of time so far, because most of the structural weight via the inner bricks is being put onto the in tact inner part of the lintel.The inner leaf is the one that does the real work, and it is fine...
View attachment 322237
IMO the disruption and further damage from any structural repair efforts would be far more likely to cause damage than just leaving it alone and patching up.
It goes rusty sometime because its left lying around whilst waiting to be fixed, clean bars ( usually high yield with ribs for extra grip) will arrive one day and can be fixed and concreted within a weekCement preserves steel, so normally nothing is used. In fact reinforcing steel is deliberately left to rust so it's rough enough to be grip
I look forward to Woodys answer to that with bated breathThanks. Out of interest what is the difference between a slab and a beam?
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local