Does Nato have

The Manchester bombing was one of the unintended consequences of the NATO bombing of Libya

Complete bulls hit
The parents fled Libya back in the 90s after becoming opponents of Colonel Gaddafi's regime
Abedi was born in Manchester in the UK.

pits got FA to do with NATO bombing of Libya and everything to do with an easy Ilya led person being radicalised.


All your anti NATO arguments are based on siding with the bully and playing the victim.
 
Sponsored Links
I still think that before the convoy enters Kyiv, Putin will be forced to empty his drawers at the Kremlin office and escorted from the building, or shot.

I hope so, but fear those closest to him all agree with him and want to expand and rebuild the Russian empire.
 
or just stop nato breaking agreements about sticking weapons into neighbouring countries
 
Sponsored Links
or just stop nato breaking agreements about sticking weapons into neighbouring countries

Another Vladimir apologist. There is only one aggressor here, you must have some kind of twisted view of the world to believe otherwise.
 
Another Vladimir apologist. There is only one aggressor here, you must have some kind of twisted view of the world to believe otherwise.
im not apologising for him whatsoever im saying he is right unfortunately the Ukrainian population are suffering for voting in someone not up to the job . Who took America`s money instead of staying neutral . Remember when the boot was on the other foot and Americas reaction was we are going to nuke you
 
NATO ignored a drone that flew over Romania and Hungary before crashing in Croatia, that's sending out the wrong signal.

Maybe it was a friendly drone and NATO chose to ignore it......who knows? :sneaky:
 
or just stop nato breaking agreements about sticking weapons into neighbouring countries

Nato has not installed nukes in Ukraine.

Maybe Russia should stop breaking agreements to respect and secure its neighbours borders.
 
Nato has not installed nukes in Ukraine.

Maybe Russia should stop breaking agreements to respect and secure its neighbours borders.

The idea that we could hit Russia substantially quicker from Ukraine than we could from Germany or a handful of other friendly nations is just nonsensical. Like it would make a difference anyway in a global nuclear war.

Same goes for the threat of conventional warfare against Russia, like any nation on earth has the slightest notion of attacking the country with largest nuclear arsenal in the world.

The justifications so far are just pitiful and it's incredible how many people in the west are buying it and repeating them.

The De-Nazification one is a good example of this... the new tactic seems to be asking the question "what other reason does Russia have for targeting Ukraine, other than De-Nazification?"

It's a weird phenomena because it seems to be prevalent on both the further Right and Left, the commonality appears to be people with generally "anti-establishment" views. The Left side are typically anti-Western and the Right are typically "anti-mass media, anti-normie-narrative"...

These people are bigger threat to us than we give it credit I reckon.
 
The invasion of the ukraine proves why the west wants these countries next to russia as buffer zones in the hope of any war being a conventional war it slows them down till they can get boots on the ground in numbers and weapons etc into place
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top