EICR failed on things that passed the previous time

...Quite often with terminations like that, its possible to get a test probe down the side of the conductor and onto the live terminal,
Quite a standard facility with 16mm² insulated and sheathed cable in an average meter designed for 35mm².
 
Sponsored Links
Unless the contrator is one of the rare breed still authorised to pull the cutout and carries registered crimpers
As you imply, there are are a few electricians who have been authorised by a DNO to pull cutout fuses, but are even they allowed to 'interfere with' the meter tails, other than at the downstream end of the one coming from the meter?
 
When I had a main fuse upgrade (60A to 100A) the blokes from UK Power noted that the existing tails were non-compliant as they had the outer insulation (black) removed by a couple of inches to show the colours of the cables inside. This was done by the previous DNO in the 1980s when the cutout was leaking bitumen and they replaced everything. Anyway, the new cutout required new tails so all good.
 
As you imply, there are are a few electricians who have been authorised by a DNO to pull cutout fuses, but are even they allowed to 'interfere with' the meter tails, other than at the downstream end of the one coming from the meter?


I would say no.
 
Sponsored Links
When I had a main fuse upgrade (60A to 100A) the blokes from UK Power noted that the existing tails were non-compliant as they had the outer insulation (black) removed by a couple of inches to show the colours of the cables inside. This was done by the previous DNO in the 1980s when the cutout was leaking bitumen and they replaced everything. Anyway, the new cutout required new tails so all good.
Yes probably. But DNOs operate to different regulations.
The EICR is done against BS7671. This issue would score C3 - improvement recommended - so the installation should be marked as satisfactory.
 
This issue would score C3 - improvement recommended - so the installation should be marked as satisfactory.
That seems to be where people disagree, some seem to insist on a literal intepretation of the guidance and treat any basic insulation visible outside an enclosure as a C2, whereas others take a more nuanced view and conclude that a small ring of basic insulation visible for identification purposes is not a big deal.
 
That seems to be where people disagree, some seem to insist on a literal intepretation of the guidance and treat any basic insulation visible outside an enclosure as a C2 ...
What 'guidance' would that be -is this NICEIC again?
, whereas others take a more nuanced view and conclude that a small ring of basic insulation visible for identification purposes is not a big deal.
... which, as I have suggested, would seem to me to be a sensible view.
 
This was what mine looked like two years ago before they were changed. I suspect that the UK Power electricians were concerned about the amount of insulation that had been removed all those years ago. I wonder if they would have changed them if I hadn't ordered a more powerful cutout.
 

Attachments

  • Old tails.jpg
    Old tails.jpg
    289.5 KB · Views: 35
That's pretty 'extreme' - more so than anything I've personally seen before. It's usually just a few mm, as in the piccie I posted.
I'd say approaching an inch was more typical.
I've just had a look at mine, fully expecting to 20 patches of red and black but much to my surprise a lot less shows, like 1-2mm at the meter, at the henley only 4 of the 8 show and they are quite modest.
 
What 'guidance' would that be -is this NICEIC again?
Well "electrical safety first", but that's essentially the same thing.


In the "C2" section.

"Sheath of an insulated and sheathed non-
armoured cable not taken inside the enclosure
of an accessory, such as at a socket-outlet or
lighting switch, where the unsheathed cores are
accessible to touch and/or likely to come into
contact with metalwork.
(Note: Code C3 would apply if the unsheathed
cores are not accessible to touch nor likely
to come into contact with metalwork)"
 
Well "electrical safety first", but that's essentially the same thing.
Need I say more? ;)
"Sheath of an insulated and sheathed non-armoured cable not taken inside the enclosure of an accessory, such as at a socket-outlet or lighting switch, where the unsheathed cores are accessible to touch and/or likely to come into contact with metalwork. (Note: Code C3 would apply if the unsheathed cores are not accessible to touch nor likely to come into contact with metalwork)"
It wouldn't (in my opinion!) be quite so 'bad' if they had included a "likely" in relation to touch, as well as in relation to contact with metalwork. I doubt that a significant number of people will ever go anywhere near meter/cutout tails, so is surely is exceeding UNlikely that they would ever touch the exposed insulation - even electricians usually only deal with tails when they have been de-energised!

As we've often discussed, anything to do with electricity (at the voltage we're talking about) id "potentially dangerous' - so, if we are going to call this one C2 what non-conformity with S7671 would NOT warrant a C2?
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top