Yes. I did.No, you didn't.
Yes. I did.No, you didn't.
Easy to check.Yes. I did.
go fetch. Good dog.Easy to check.
My post,
#308 of the Post Office thread.
You posted nothing in reply.
Easy for all to verify that your both a liar, and a coward.
back it up. big mouth.No answer then.
Like I said, liar
go fetch the post. good dog.Liar.
There for all to see.
You made the accusation, it's up to you to prosecute the case, providing all the evidence.I've already said, nothing to fetch.
Go fetch your non-existent post, post it up here, and I'll apologise.
I'll not be holding my breath though.
Liar.
You made the accusation, it's up to you to prosecute the case, providing all the evidence.
Off you go. good dog.
It shouldn't be. I was taught as a 17 yo that if the lights are out, to treat the junction as if the lights never existed and give way. It's no biggie.I mean I can't see how the absence of a set of traffic lights is the primary cause of a collision.
Five sets of lights. That doesn't sound like a trivial one. The police had to station officers there to manage traffic.It shouldn't be. I was taught as a 17 yo that if the lights are out, to treat the junction as if the lights never existed and give way. It's no biggie.
I've seen accidents in 1 way lanes in car parks, let alone junctions controlled because of the volume of traffic and possible directions available.Five sets of lights. That doesn't sound like a trivial one. The police had to station officers there to manage traffic.
So we don't need traffic lights? GoodI've seen traffic move more freely when the lights are out.