- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,658
- Reaction score
- 2,341
- Country
What question?Denso that's really helpful but maybe you could try to address the question rather than swerve?
What question?Denso that's really helpful but maybe you could try to address the question rather than swerve?
They are claiming it is a service charge because that is payable under the convention the Americans are quoting. That is probably the only reason, it was a response to them.Ok let’s entertain this idea that it is a service fee. for a moment.
It doesn't meet the definition of a tax.you need to explain how it is not a Tax.
So the GOVERNMENT statement doesn't count?Ok let’s entertain this idea that it is a service fee. for a moment.
What service is being provided and where are the elements necessary to show a binding contract and commitment to pay in exchange for the service?
Good luck
Carman isn't the Government.Do I need to teach you how to read now. Its the post you replied to. To help you out a bit its post 1623 that Carmen is avoiding replying to.
Here is a hint in your answer you need to explain how it is not a Tax.
View attachment 343979
I'm not a legal or financial expert.Carmen why won't you answer? Its a simple question you say its not a Tax but won't say why?
Well here you go. Swerving as usual. Just to help you Diplomats don't need to pay Tax and are not doing so.The British Government therefore expects all diplomatic missions to respect UK laws and regulations, which includes payment of the Congestion Charge.
It's not quite as simple as youWell here you go. Swerving as usual. Just to help you Diplomats don't need to pay Tax and are not doing so.
Stop telling lies.Oh come they say they don't need to pay as its a Tax you say the do. Not too difficult is it.
Stop lieing then, it's that simpleOh dear grow up Carmen