On a massive overload a fuse will always operate faster than a circuit breaker. ... A circuit breaker is a mechanical device and as such it takes time for the parts to move and open the device, where as a fuse only needs to melt a bit of wire. Of course we are only taking milli seconds here, but it could be enough.
That's all true, but I rather doubt that we are talking about a "massive overload". For a start, the PSCC would only have been about 250A, which is not really all that massive in relation to a 60A fuse. Also, FWIW, there was no evidence of a massive overload. The capsule of the lamp/bulb remained intact, there was no suggestion of any blackening etc. around either bulb base or lampholder, and the contacts (and all other parts) of both the base and the lampholder looked absolutely normal.
It's obviously a bit of a mystery but I think I'm most inclined to the theory that the MCB correctly did not trip immediately in response to a fault current which was actually less than 5I
n but that an ailing (or congenitally abnormal) fuse for some reason blew with that modest current.
You'll notice on your fuse operating time graphs in bs7671 that fuses have a perfect curve to them, where circuit breakers start with a straight line and then a curve.
If you mean the 'straight line' at high current (5I
n for a Type B), that 'two-part' curve is obviously a reflection of the fact that the MCB has both magnetic and thermal modes of action. The thermal part of the curve is not dissimilar to that for a fuse.
Having said all that, I'd have expected both devices to operate, not just the fuse.
If the current really was high enough to blow a (correctly functioning) 60A fuse then, yes, I would have expected the MCB to also operate. However, as above, I'm not convinced that the current was necessarily that high.
Kind Regards, John