F16 fighter jets

Wars are good for bussiness

For some

Plus they get to test there equipment in an actual combat situation which is needed for

R&D
 
Sponsored Links
Tis a war of attrition

Same as the Russians experienced in dire ear a Stan

And the same as nato experienced in the same dire ear a Stan

Similar to Vietnam for the US

These wats were never won militarily as such by the taliban or Vietnamese
 
You however seem to think that flying a fast jet in combat conditions is nowt' more than popping down the shops in a 4dr hatchback.
Ukrainians had no trouble delivering storm shadows using their su-24's. I don't see why f16 truck drivers should act like spoiled princesses. The planes will be supplied along with the support needed for their operations. So don't try to squirm you way out of it. Your country has nurtured and fed you well. Now for some gratitude of heroism. If you succeed in helping to bring russia down, your descendants will live like kings for generations from the spoils of victory.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Clearly false. If the natives never picked up arms, america would still be there like it is there in japan and germany.

Clearly not false and incidentally

There has been a native insurgency in Burma for what 30 / 40 years
And on going)
 
There has been a native insurgency in Burma for what 30 / 40 years
And on going)
China has no territorial interest in Burma. The insurgency is only there to keep the country in check from the influence of Britain and the US. With the goddess of democracy locked up, china has the upper hand there. Both the government and the insurgency are armed by china.
 
China has no territorial interest in Burma. The insurgency is only there to keep the country in check from the influence of Britain and the US. With the goddess of democracy locked up, china has the upper hand there. Both the government and the insurgency are armed by china.
A Russian and Chinese supporter. Who'd have thought it...
 
A Russian and Chinese supporter. Who'd have thought it...
I am a humanity supporter. With nato pinned down in ukraine, the world is spared conflicts. Not to mention the peaceful decolonisation of africa currently taking place which will bring more peace.
 
Good lad. Better for humanity if countries don't invade their neighbours, but bad things happen sometimes.
 
Good lad. Better for humanity if countries don't invade their neighbours, but bad things happen sometimes.
Invasion is justified in self defence. Russia has no interest in ukraine, they are after the decapitation missile systems in eastern europe.
 
China has no territorial interest in Burma. The insurgency is only there to keep the country in check from the influence of Britain and the US. With the goddess of democracy locked up, china has the upper hand there. Both the government and the insurgency are armed by china.

The Karen insurgency has been going on for 30 / 40 years

As for some of yer other
other comments load of ball cocks
 
What, they will invade more countries? Good grief...
Unlikely. They want to force those missiles systems out. They can do that by getting close to the missiles systems. If ukraine rented a path to russia, an invasion would not have been necessary. Ukraine inserted itself in someone else's fight and paid the price accordingly. The country looks kaput to me.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top