- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,421
- Reaction score
- 2,784
- Country
the beeb disagrees with you as do most of the press.You're assuming that the lengthy detailed nuanced report is defamatory. Nothing has happened that changes the position that far-rage was exited for commercial considerations - the ending of his mortgage, there was no other additional reason to keep him on. Perfectly reasonable position for an elite bank to take. The beebs story is entirely defensible
Exclusivity and inclusivity are not incompatible.
Blup
They engineered the commercial glide plan. Obvious only a court can decide if it’s defamatory, but it certainly meets the test. Some of the claims are also higher level defamation, where the burden of disproof switches to the defendant.