I am having flow rate problems with my Central Heating. I have a CH boiler in the garage, which is 15 metres away from the point at which the pipes split to serve various zones in the house. My flow rate with all radiators open is 20 litres per minute
To try to pinpoint where the problem is I have disconnected the 15 metres of 22 mm pipe from my CH radiators and connected them end to end, so I have a simple loop of 30 metres of 22mm plastic pipe (plus about 8 elbows and the flow meter) that simply connect the outlet from my boiler back to the inlet of the boiler. I can still only get a flow rate of about 26 litres per minute.
I have been told to replace the 22mm pipe by 28mm pipe (which I guess will increase the flow), but I am wondering if the pump is under performing.
The documentation of the pump gives expected flow rates depending on the 'External Static Pressure', measured in MH2O (which I guess is 'Metres of water').
My question is: How do I calculate the External Static Pressure of my 30 meters of pipe (both for the existing 22mm pipe and the proposed 28mm pipe)? Is there a standard 'ESP per metre' for eash type of pipe?
Thanks Bill
To try to pinpoint where the problem is I have disconnected the 15 metres of 22 mm pipe from my CH radiators and connected them end to end, so I have a simple loop of 30 metres of 22mm plastic pipe (plus about 8 elbows and the flow meter) that simply connect the outlet from my boiler back to the inlet of the boiler. I can still only get a flow rate of about 26 litres per minute.
I have been told to replace the 22mm pipe by 28mm pipe (which I guess will increase the flow), but I am wondering if the pump is under performing.
The documentation of the pump gives expected flow rates depending on the 'External Static Pressure', measured in MH2O (which I guess is 'Metres of water').
My question is: How do I calculate the External Static Pressure of my 30 meters of pipe (both for the existing 22mm pipe and the proposed 28mm pipe)? Is there a standard 'ESP per metre' for eash type of pipe?
Thanks Bill