Four 'unaccompanied child migrants' gang-rape woman

Sponsored Links
A terrible, disgusting heinous act.

Note that
1) Not in the U.K. and
2) over a year ago

Why do you think the Daily Mail, Express, Sun has a constant narrative of reporting crimes committed by migrants?


Collage-of-a-number-of-front-pages-of-Daily-Mail-Daily-Express-and-The-Star-between.png


Daily Mail have form over many years


German-Jews-Pouring-into-this-Country-Daily-Mail-20.8.38-Wikimedia-Commons.jpg
 
Wow reply no1 already apologising

I’m just wondering what country they think it’s ok to gang rape a women in ?

The judge obviously bought into their sob story.

Colour and race irrelevant to me, it’s the fact they got short sentence because they need “guidance”

 
Note that
1) Not in the U.K.
Does that make it OK/irrelevant?
And 2) over a year ago
Does that make it OK/irrelevant?

They could have come here, unchecked and they could have been located near to you so consider yourself lucky. You may not be so lucky in the future. How would you feel about unchecked immigration then?
 
Sponsored Links
So we've to deduce they come from a country or countries where it's deemed okay to drag a female off a bench and rape her? I say that because the judge states they 'need guidance' re how to live in Dutch society, therefore asserting they don't know it's not okay to rape?

And folk wonder why political parties more to the right are gaining in popularity.

Given it's a terrible crime, they should have been dealt with in exactly the same way a Dutch national would be. Comes back to my point, the law should treat everyone the same.
 
So we've to deduce they come from a country or countries where it's deemed okay to drag a female off a bench and rape her? I say that because the judge states they 'need guidance' re how to live in Dutch society, therefore asserting they don't know it's not okay to rape?

And folk wonder why political parties more to the right are gaining in popularity.

Given it's a terrible crime, they should have been dealt with in exactly the same way a Dutch national would be. Comes back to my point, the law should treat everyone the same.

This bit as well:

The verdict, which has been slammed as lenient, took into account the 'lack of supervision and guidance' offered to the perpetrators.
 
How would you feel about unchecked immigration then
We don’t have unchecked immigration

If people come via normal routes they are subject to checks
If people arrive by illegal means in small boats, they are processed and put into the asylum application system…..so they are subject to checks.

Which ones are you claiming are unchecked?
 
No one wants that, more safe routes would cut boat traffic in an instant.
What, you think they’ll give checkable details via a safe route compared to an unsafe one? "No, no, I’m not Muhammad the rapist from Afghanistan, I’m Muhammad the Doctor from Iraq".
Which ones are you claiming are unchecked?
The ones that come over with no papers. How do you check them, especially if they are 'Children’?
 
What, you think they’ll give checkable details via a safe route compared to an unsafe one?
Some will, which will start to hurt the gangsters boat viability. You do realise most boat people got asylum when they applied?

"No, no, I’m not Muhammad the rapist from Afghanistan, I’m Muhammad the Doctor from Iraq".
That's just your bigotry coming to the surface again.
 
The ones that come over with no papers. How do you check them, especially if they are 'Children’?
A person has to provide evidence of who they are to claim asylum.

They don’t get asylum without proof of who they are.

So they are checked.

I realise facts are upsetting for you, but yo7 can’t argue against facts, they are what they are
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top