Smart, or led by the nose for twelve years by an education establishment that teaches them only one way.
Thankfully that is now a settled fact.On the subject of CC:-
Denso?People with entrenched views will spend their life convincing others they are wrong. They will find evidence everywhere and they will blame people who "don't get it" as fools.
I remember as a kid in the late 70s hearing that the world would run out of oil before the end of the century. Humans have a way of solving problems.
Did the Tories not get a landslide in the last election?
This shows that the majority of the electorate is conservative but that who they voted for are not.They did on the back of Brexit voters then sold them down the river.
The brilliant Mark Steyn, a true conservative. had two heart attacks recently.right-wing news outlets, like GBNews, don't?
That's because:The Guardian accepts donations and doesn't hide behind a paywall
In the above though, more a case of kicking the can down the road (at least since the climate issues have become more starkly evident).
That's because:
1) The type of people who read The Guardian don't pay for things and
2) Nobody would pay to read it anyway.
The history of human development is intricately linked with global warming. While part of the rise in Earth’s surface temperature can be attributed to natural patterns of climate change, these historical trends shed some light on how much human activities are behind the rapid increase in global average temperatures in the last 85 years.
Glaciers melting; rain falling over Greenland; rising sea levels; forty degrees in Coningsby last summer - how much more evidence do you require, squire?
The average temperature of the Earth has varied during the past one thousand years. Grape growing and wine making were possible in England between 1100 and 1300--a time known as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP). The Vikings settled Greenland at this time. There were 3000 farmers in Greenland in 1300, but they died out during a time known as the Little Ice Age (LIA), which ran from 1350 to 1850. The Thames froze solidly during some winters in Shakespeare's time, an occasion for "Frost Fairs." The last Frost Fair occurred in 1814, the last time the Thames froze solidly. The MWP and the LIA were global phenomena, although not all areas were equally affected. The modern warming trend started in 1850 and it too is a global phenomenon.
It is possible to estimate the actual temperature increases and decreases that occurred in the past one thousand years. The MWP was 1°C or 2°C warmer than the average temperature of the millennium. The LIA was 1°C or 2°C colder. The current warm era is about 0.75°C warmer and thus not warmer than the MWP. Grape growing and wine making are still not possible in areas that supported it during the MWP. These temperature excursions, both positive and negative, are not very different from excursions occurring during the past 10,000 years.
Prior to 1850, carbon dioxide concentration is in the range typical of a warm, interglacial period. Carbon dioxide concentration is perhaps a little higher during the MWP and a little lower during the LIA. The correlation is not very convincing. However, one thing jumps out. Carbon dioxide concentration started increasing decisively around 1850. By 1900, it is clear that a 400,000 year old pattern ended.
Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas. The greenhouse effect of methane is 20 times greater than carbon dioxide, but there is less methane in the atmosphere. The net result is that methane contributes to about 25% of global warming. Like carbon dioxide, methane concentration started increasing decisively around 1850. Now methane concentration is at unprecedented levels. This is additional evidence that the 400,000 year old pattern has ended.
Source
What is the point when people still deny the evidence of their own eyes?Your point - to me - being?
Which people?What is the point when people still deny the evidence of their own eyes?
The WEF puppet rishy spelled out today as a true globalist would how he will work with our eu neighbours and countries elsewhere.
Brexit rishi? your having a laugh.
That people, for one.Which people?
So you don't think his language shows him for what he is?That people, for one.
Rish! is what he is: a Tory technocrat. I didn't listen to his speech but read commentaries which weren't impressed by his words.So you don't think his language shows him for what he is?
No truer saying than we get the politicians we deserve.