You may be right, but whilst we have been cleaning house and getting itin order, everyone else has simply been cleaning up!!
I don't understand this reply at all kendor. The grace period you refer to is being blatantly ignored by some of the other memberstates. You don't need me to point this out just watch the telly and you will see for yourself. The other memberstates, who still produce vehicles, have a hidden policy of buying their own products. No doubt this policy extends to things we don't see too. They are clearly only members for their own good and are not acting in the spirit of the EU by wording their tender specs to suit home grown products. We should do the same.kendor said:I'm not sure if you are aware of a grace period with eu rules i know being a spark that many rules in my trade have had this period of grace, colour coding of cables is one where we have had more than 20 years to comply.david and julie said:The problem is again the EU or to be more correct the way our public bodies rigidly play by the EU rules, tenders for the supply of goods in the public sector now have to be offered EU wide, hence the reason why we have foreign fire engines, ambulances etc. We seem to obey the rules to the letter whilst the continentals have a different approach. Next time you see an emergency in another EU state on the telly,look at the vehicles the emergency services use, they are almost always home produced.
I once read that they read the specs of any suitable vehicles and then narrowly define the tender criteria so that only the home grown variant can fully fit the bill. This is actually blatant fiddling of EU rules but they can get away with it. We should do the same but our public bodies don't give a toss and why would they? they are all on jobs and pensions for life.
Why would the loss 20000 jobs bother your average civil servant?
so it probably is the same in these other countries, eventually all will have to comply as an when they get their acts together.
then when all countries comply to all rules the eu will not look so one sided to some.
as i've said in the past it's a mammoth task in bringing all this legislation together and is not going to be an overnight job, especially if obstacles are put in the way such as an electorate voting against policymakers.
we need to either give the system a chance(this may not happen in our lifetime but for our children) or leave now and perhaps regret the move in the future, would you like to take that risk? would you have the knowledge that your move would be the correct one to take?
That's why i believe it's best left to the experts and like a lot of things in life put your trust in others more suited to the job.
whatever decision the public come to let's hope it's the correct one for all our sakes.
Are you really saying the electorate should only vote for EU friendly Gov's to speed up this experiment? What about the millions of people like me who never had a say and don't want the EU?as i've said in the past it's a mammoth task in bringing all this legislation together and is not going to be an overnight job, especially if obstacles are put in the way such as an electorate voting against policymakers.
Do you mean the likes of Neil Kinnock here? has he truthfully ever had a proper job? has he ever worked in industry or commerce? The EU/UK experiment has been going for over 30 years now,at what point do they admit it is a failure?That's why i believe it's best left to the experts and like a lot of things in life put your trust in others more suited to the job
When I was still driving I bought a French car, despite not being too fond of the French, because I knew it would be more reliable than the English equivalent. It was a simple decision: a Peugeot 405 (later replaced by a Citroen Xantia) or a Rover 200/400 series. I'm glad I chose the former, as the Montego I had a few years earlier was nothing but hassle.
I understand the parts & spares have to be available for the next 10 years.pipme said:I wonder what happens regarding spares and warranties if manufacture ceases totally ?
securespark said:I too have been a huge fan of BL down the years - fantastic ideas with poor execution.
The problem has been lack of investment. For years they have used stuff from the same parts bin to cut costs.
I moved my niece recently, and hired a 54 plate LDV Luton. The interior door handles were exactly the same as the ones in my Dad's 1962 1100.
BMW I hate with venom.
They took over Rover. OK, they were losing money, but they stayed just long enough to sniff out the most profitable brands from them, then they f'd off.
They took the SUV range, snaffled the idea for a mini replacement, and left the dregs.
How Phoenix/Towers were supposed to make a profit on car designs dating back to the early 90's, I don't know. But they did work wonders initially, cutting losses hugely after BMW left.
See this great website for the struggling cash-strapped history of BL.
www.austin-rover.co.uk/wsindexf.htm