Curious they would put an indicator on the 'commercial' version only, and that the spec. is otherwise identical!
Could it be the fact there often fitted sideways, i believe there is certain rules regarding them indicating whether there on/off
Curious they would put an indicator on the 'commercial' version only, and that the spec. is otherwise identical!
Thanks. That's what I've always thought, as described by me a couple of posts back.For domestic installs <100A, there is always an upstream fuse, and the breaking capacity of devices can be less than 16kA as specified in that standard. That only applies if the consumer unit is installed as specified by the manufacturer, and contains the devices made by that manufacturer. It's one of the reasons shoving MCBs from different manufacturers into the same enclosure is a very bad idea.
Is there any logical (as opposed to regulatory) reason why that cannot be used to justify a DB containing 'mixed' 6kA devices in a domestic installation?For other installations the same principles apply, however it is up to the designer of the installation to ensure that the combination of protective devices used are appropriate for the fault levels at each part of the installation.
Could it be the fact there often fitted sideways, i believe there is certain rules regarding them indicating whether there on/off
That would certainly make sense, but I can't say I've ever seen any indication that ones which do not have an on/off indication should not be fitted 'sideways' (in order to satisfy a 'rule' such as you suggest), have you?Could it be the fact there often fitted sideways, i believe there is certain rules regarding them indicating whether there on/off
No - but by mixing devices, the installer becomes the designer of the assembly, and is therefore responsible for any problems that may occur from it's use.Is there any logical (as opposed to regulatory) reason why that cannot be used to justify a DB containing 'mixed' 6kA devices in a domestic installation?
This all sounds very 'hypothetical' to me.No - but by mixing devices, the installer becomes the designer of the assembly, and is therefore responsible for any problems that may occur from it's use. If full design calculations and other specifications were made available and the decision to use a variety of different devices could be justified, then there would be no problem. .... That would need to include an analysis of the thermal, electrical, and electromagnetic characteristics of the devices both individually and when combined within the assembly. ... Since no one is likely to want to do any of that, sensible people install the devices provided by the manufacturer. ... Others may just fling in any old rubbish and hope they are not identified when the building burns down.
I suppose that, even in a domestic installation, one could put each and every protective device in a separate enclosure, but that would be plain silly, and would seemingly achieve nothing particularly useful!In larger installations, the two or more protective devices are not contained within the same assembly, which makes the design of the installation vastly simpler.
What I was getting at was maybe Hager decided the window was a better option on there brand, rather than a necessity, whereas others opted for an alternative means of on/off indication, to satisfy the standard there made to.That would certainly make sense, but I can't say I've ever seen any indication that ones which do not have an on/off indication should not be fitted 'sideways' (in order to satisfy a 'rule' such as you suggest), have you?
Kind Regards, John
do you really believe that any combination of devices (each rated at 6 kA) could possibly fail to have adequate breaking capacity?
That makes sense, but the greater problem is when they are not visibly damaged or destroyed, but perhaps no longer able to do quite what it says on their tin - yet essentially untestable. I certainly don't think I would be very comfortable relying on a device after I knew or suspected that it had broken a current anywhere near its 'rating'.I remember hearing somewhere that they are "guaranteed" to break the rated current, and possibly more, but not more than once (i.e. they may be destroyed while carrying out their duty)
Maybe ... but what "alternative means of on/off indication" did you have in mind?What I was getting at was maybe Hager decided the window was a better option on there brand, rather than a necessity, whereas others opted for an alternative means of on/off indication, to satisfy the standard there made to. ...
As I implied, that's what I would have thought.The colour indicator must go to red or green to indicate the position of the contacts, regardless of the position of the lever.
Who knows? - I can't read his mind At least some MK (and I think some Wylex) RCDs operate as you describe, but that's nothing to do with the presence/absence of colour indicators.Might he have been thinking of RCDs such as MEM, which break to an intermediate position, and have to be manually moved further "off" before they can be reset to "on?"
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local