- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,814
- Reaction score
- 859
- Country
Correct.It's not called a 'clot shot'
Correct.It's not called a 'clot shot'
One wonders if the words 'natural causes' have been used far too often rather than revealing the real cause?
Where does it say that?No, they had to record a death as from the 'virus' if there had been a positive test in the previous 28 days regardless of the real cause of death...
Simple maths: you have to have taken the preceding jab or jabs, for the second / third / whatever to be....... the second / third / whatever......Do you know why fewer people took the second jab than the first?
And why even fewer took the third jab than the second?
And why even fewer took the fourth etc etc????
They are required "to state the cause of death to the best of their knowledge and belief"."For example, if before death the patient had symptoms typical of COVID-19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘COVID-19’ as the cause of death"
Found a source for this yet?they had to record a death as from the 'virus' if there had been a positive test in the previous 28 days regardless of the real cause of death...
Ellals getting confused with death certificates and the mortality reports from hospitals. Theyre different data feeds entirely.They are required "to state the cause of death to the best of their knowledge and belief".
Pesky lying doctors.
Found a source for this yet?
Recently? Flu jab?remind us what you recently said why you got vaxxed
no the covid jab . what were the reasons you said you got it for ?Recently? Flu jab?
What were they told then?That’s not what they got told at all.
They can just make it up as they go along
forgetting what you wrote .Yes, that's what they do - but only in your distorted version of the world.
Same reasons as the flu jab.no the covid jab . what were the reasons you said you got it for ?
and what was that or can you not find what you put ?Same reasons as the flu jab.