- Joined
- 31 Aug 2005
- Messages
- 4,207
- Reaction score
- 400
- Country
Come on then armchair experts lets hear it, seeing as a few of you on here think you could do better than our government.
Ill go first as it's my game.
Understanding and re prioritising approach.
I believe we are doing this all wrong, instead of blanket immunisation of the whole population we should focus on the 'allergic' ones, it seems evident some people are dying due to a hypersensitivity, we should first identify and test our NHS staff and public ages 20-40 for this hypersensitivity marker.
We then identify these people and first immunise or engineer immunomodulator therapy in order to treat them if infected which would unlock the rest of this agegroup to return to normal life, knowing the rest may only suffer mild symptoms if ill.
Move to 40-60 repeat again.
This would significantly reduce the main risk groups and free up NHS until we develop a national vaccine.
Ill go first as it's my game.
Understanding and re prioritising approach.
I believe we are doing this all wrong, instead of blanket immunisation of the whole population we should focus on the 'allergic' ones, it seems evident some people are dying due to a hypersensitivity, we should first identify and test our NHS staff and public ages 20-40 for this hypersensitivity marker.
We then identify these people and first immunise or engineer immunomodulator therapy in order to treat them if infected which would unlock the rest of this agegroup to return to normal life, knowing the rest may only suffer mild symptoms if ill.
Move to 40-60 repeat again.
This would significantly reduce the main risk groups and free up NHS until we develop a national vaccine.