I give up.

[EFLImpudence]

He was answering nosebag.

Ah, Sorry. I beg his pardon.

 

[EFLImpudence]

Would it be more productive to offer reasons why you think my original post wrong?

Once I've established what you mean by stupid then I may comment. Whether it is right or wrong is not something I have questioned. Yet.

All the time on here and you've never thought about it?

How much longer must the fallacy be prolonged that we must respect people's religious beliefs?

I'm not sure what this sentence means.

You do seem to have trouble with English.

 

[noseall]

All the time on here and you've never thought about it?

You bandy the word 'stupid' about as if you own it. You seem incapable of doing anything stupid yourself. What I was wondering was whether someone as perfect as you make yourself out to be, is wise to criticise the stupidity others. When you refer to people being stupid, do you mean inherently stupid or that they are doing stupid things?

How much longer must the fallacy be prolonged that we must respect people's religious beliefs?

Can you just explain what you mean please?

 

[Deleted member 63160]

All the time on here and you've never thought about it?

You bandy the word 'stupid' about as if you own it. You seem incapable of doing anything stupid yourself. What I was wondering was whether someone as perfect as you make yourself out to be, is wise to criticise the stupidity others. When you refer to people being stupid, do you mean inherently stupid or that they are doing stupid things?

How much longer must the fallacy be prolonged that we must respect people's religious beliefs?

Can you just explain what you mean please?

Sheet mate. Its all easy words???

 

[Whitespirit66]

Mecca should go back to being a Bingo hall.

Have been wondering for quite a while when there will be pressure to change the name of their bingo halls.

 

[EFLImpudence]

You're being silly again.

All the time on here and you've never thought about it?

You bandy the word 'stupid' about as if you own it. You seem incapable of doing anything stupid yourself. What I was wondering was whether someone as perfect as you make yourself out to be, is wise to criticise the stupidity others.

Your inferrence is illogical.

When you refer to people being stupid, do you mean inherently stupid or that they are doing stupid things?

Well, they are definitely doing stupid things so draw your own conclusion.





Perhaps I'm just playing devil's advocate after a long day being a pillar and being stoned.

 

[noseall]

How much longer must the fallacy be prolonged that we must respect people's religious beliefs?

Sheet mate. Its all easy words???

When I read it verbatim, he is saying that respecting people's religious beliefs is a fallacy, so how does one prolong a fallacy? It doesn't make sense.

 

[Whitespirit66]

Jeez. It's going to be another slow night if nosey needs everything explained to him again and again.

 

[JohnD]

EFL is entitled to write words that have no sensible meaning, and nose is entitled to try to find out if there is any sense behind them.

There isn't.

Here is an example of another walking rectum who has no respect for other's religions.

 

[longdogs]

Jeez. It's going to be another slow night if nosey needs everything explained to him again and again.

Can you imagine what it must be like for his boyfriend.

 

[noseall]

Fallacy is a false belief, misapprehension, delusion etc. It's easily googled. You prolong it by choosing to ignore the obvious, the evidence against. In this instance, I feel, the poster sees the continual respecting of evil beliefs as being necessary, as a "fallacy", a delusion of sorts. Regardless of whether you see islaam for the stench filled cesspit of hate that it is, his comment is quite clear.

Mitch, EFLI's sentence does not make sense.
However your above paragraph goes one better.

"I feel the poster sees the continual respecting of evil beliefs as being necessary"......WTF......then you say "as a fallacy".
Can you make some fecking sense now please and stop talking drivel.

 

[noseall]

Jeez. It's going to be another slow night if nosey needs everything explained to him again and again.

Can you make sense of it?

How much longer must the fallacy be prolonged that we must respect people's religious beliefs?

 

[Brigadier]

Here is an example of another walking rectum who has no respect for other's religions.

News flash - he's been braaaan bred for a few years.

 

[JohnD]

So has Bernard Manning, and Hitler.

If only the same could be said for others driven by ethnic and religious hatred and intolerance.

 

[JBR]

"They converge on Mina to throw stones at pillars representing the devil."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-34346449

How much longer must the fallacy be prolonged that we must respect people's religious beliefs?

It's nonsense and they are stupid.

This made me think.
Do we still have to respect such religions as witchcraft and the even older animist beliefs?
As far as I know, these beliefs predate islam, Christianity and possibly even Judaism; in other words, they have been going for much longer and are, therefore, by definition longer established religions. Yet they are generally considered to be primitive and unworthy of serious consideration and carry no weight when people's rights are discussed.
Who decides which religions are worthy of respect and which are to be subject to derision?
Who decides which religions should impact on our society and even our laws?

My personal opinion is that ALL religions and beliefs in supernatural beings are utter tripe, whether they worship trees, cats or even 'invisible friends'. There has never been any concrete evidence of gods, demigods, sprites and the like, other than the statements and insistence of believers (admittedly many in some countries). Great cathedrals have been built over the centuries at great expense in money and even human lives, due to their beliefs. This factor is often quoted as 'evidence' of a god's existence, yet I believe it is evidence only of human naivety.