Do you have a reading problem, no1 i didn't say he wasn't an object of derision. No2 i didn't ask who buys his records, i asked why do people buy his records?he may be an object of derision for some people but he isn't an object of derision for everyone. So for you say he is an object of derision is Wrong.By your question I take it that you believe it to possible that he isn't the object of derision. If you think that, then you're wrong, so ignoring that wrongness, I guess you're simply asking who buys his records. I would have thought the process was fairly simple, and quite obvious, but it's this:If he's the object of derision, why do so many people buy his records?
unknown->music published->rich/famous->celebrity->derided
Very much not.Do you have a reading problem
That's right - but I did....no1 i didn't say he wasn't an object of derision.
And I answered that question.... No2 i didn't ask who buys his records, i asked why do people buy his records?
I didn't say, or imply, that everyone hates him.he may be an object of derision for some people but he isn't an object of derision for everyone.
I disagree. He's an object of derision to anyone for whom he's an object of derision.So for you say he is an object of derision is Wrong.
You didn't answer my question, why do people buy his songs? so before you go of on a tangent let me give you the answer, because they like his music! you should get of the house more.Very much not.Do you have a reading problem
That's right - but I did....no1 i didn't say he wasn't an object of derision.
And I answered that question.... No2 i didn't ask who buys his records, i asked why do people buy his records?
I didn't say, or imply, that everyone hates him.he may be an object of derision for some people but he isn't an object of derision for everyone.
I disagree. He's an object of derision to anyone for whom he's an object of derision.So for you say he is an object of derision is Wrong.
It really isn't necessary to qualify the context for every single sentence written on the forum, just for the hard of understanding.
For example, if someone says that football is a source of pleasure and entertainment, clearly they're implying a limited context, and excluding those people who don't like it. It isn't necessary to state that it's a source of pleasure and entertainment for some people.
However, to be perfectly clear about something, this topic was created to solicit opinions on the subject in hand. I didn't think that it was necessary to state that opinions are welcome only from people who understand what I'm getting at, so I'll state it now: your opinion is not welcome, because you don't understand, so please spend your time on other topics, not this one.
You appear to be confusing me with someone who cares.You didn't answer my question
Did you know he only had one? The other one's somewhere in SWest London.Hitler tried to bomb us into submission