Fair points Space cat, but I think there’s an important difference.
Stalin and Mao were power-hungry despots and that was their driving force, not their religion or absence thereof. So, as vile as they indisputably were, I don’t see any hypocrisy whereas it is hypocritical in the extreme to extol the virtues of Christian love or any other religious benevolent or philanthropic 'bent' and then commit so much as one murder; least of all genocide!
Bringing it more up to date, both Blair and Bush should be tried for war crimes. They are so-called Christians, just like Hitler was, and I can’t think of any recent atheists who have taken us into an illegal, immoral and hypocritical war based on lies or flown an aeroplane into a tower knowing that thousands of innocents would die.
Hec, an intelligent thread I’m enjoying and getting something from without any trolling. Holds breath...
Add:
Think about it. Would you really want to live in a world with no rules at all?
Hec no!
But the 64 million dollar question is who’s rules? We have tried every religious Rule since mankind first worshiped the god of thunder and made sacrifices when ‘God turned the light out’ during an eclipse, which have all failed – always.
Isn’t it time for something new and intelligent