Intergas...but which...

This is were your social disorder comes out doesn't it Mr Robinson? If you have something to say, say it properly, explain it properly, not one liners thinking you are smarter than others. No one is impressed except your henchmen followers. Get your act together and fall into the mainstream. You have everything to gain.


You're the one continually making unfounded assertions. I am merely challenging you on them. It's interesting to see how little you actually give in answers. Claiming I have a social disorder is not going to all of a sudden make me think you are in the right. I am merely stating things as they are.
 
Sponsored Links
You're the one continually making unfounded assertions. I am merely challenging you on them.
Mt Robinson you are trying to be clever. That Google on insults I posted on your name brings it all up - and it goes back many, many years. Get a grip man, get a grip. You are a one boiler wonder.
 
Mt Robinson you are trying to be clever. That Google on insults I posted on your name brings it all up - and it goes back many, many years. Get a grip man, get a grip. You are a one boiler wonder.
Which is still one boiler more than you.
 
I smell bullschit. Are they saying their heat exchanger is 100% efficient?:

upload_2017-3-8_16-42-38.png


But that is a 39kW boiler, which the Intergas isn't so lets try and even things up and go to as close to equivalent outputs/inputs as possible. So lets take the Modena 32, which is 0.7kW under the Intergas 36/40 which is as we have established not 40kW to hot water, but actually 32.7kW. Ferroli claim this:

upload_2017-3-8_16-57-24.png


upload_2017-3-8_16-43-28.png

Again - they seem to think their heat exchanger is 100% efficient, but then it probably is the same as the 38C, so go figure.


Intergas:
upload_2017-3-8_16-47-2.png

(Obviously we're looking at the right hand column for each).

Laws of physics seem to be different for our Italian brethren. Especially as said laws, even assuming 100% heat transfer state that at input of 32kw, ΔT35 you can get 13.06 l/min.

So how the feck does Ferroli manage to get 15.3 at both ΔT's? If we take ΔT30, that gives us 15.24l/min.... but again at 100% transfer efficiency. Which we ain't gonna get. Ferroli manage to squeeze another 0.3 l/min on top of their 100%.

Now, we give the same calculations to the Intergas figures?..... This gives us 13.35 l/min at 32.7kw input and an assumed transfer efficiency of 100%. Put that to ΔT30 and that rises to 15.57 l/min. IF we use Intergas' figures of ΔT25, it is 18.69. Ferroli - a slightly more modest differential of 0.1 litre a minute. Again assuming 100% heat transfer.

Of course we can't have 100% so a bit of a reduction ius in order. Something Intergas has done. But Ferroli?


Now - a few pages back Hard On stated:

The Ferroli Modena has a model, the 38C, that can give 16 litres per minute in hot water delivery, which is quite impressive. The 32C gives 13.1. The 32kW Ferroli gives the same hot water flow rate as a 36kW Intergas. The intergas range cannot get give more than 13 litres per minute.


Where did he get 13.1 and 16 litres per minute from? Fecked if I know, but it was the actual figures from the performance tables.


He was also prattling on about modulation rates.... let's take a look shall we?

Ferroli:

upload_2017-3-8_17-8-23.png


Intergas:

upload_2017-3-8_17-8-58.png



Only 1kW in it. Not bad, but not great either, yet something that was acknowledged a loooong time ago.


Now, who is spanked by who? Where are Hard On's figures to counter these? Is he going to go on about the 40kW intergas (which doesn't exist) against the 38C Ferroli with its imaginary performance statistics? Probably, but that is, as said before and the reason for the likes of KIWA, comparing apples with oranges.

Like I said before though. Since when has fact got in the way of a Googleer and their rants/trolling? Twentyfour only appears now and again for a troll too - I've seldom seen him give any advice in other threads. So we can take his opinion with the vomit soaked vindaloo it's worth. Out of all this nonsense we have Bernard who does at least try and base some of his opinion on fact. Although more often than not fails (still waiting for that admission BTW dude). A simple "yes I was wrong" will do ;).
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-3-8_17-4-36.png
    upload_2017-3-8_17-4-36.png
    12.8 KB · Views: 229
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Bernard, I don't know how the hot water is worked out to the BS you mention but if it is the same as an EN I posted many months ago there is a tapping cycle simulating for example 2 minutes at 45 degrees at 7am then 5 minutes at another temp at 7:45 etc etc. If you search you might find ot if it was in this forum. It may well have been in the CC I don't recall. On leave, no access to it at the moment but that's how it's done, over a days use.
 
Bernard, I don't know how the hot water is worked out to the BS you mention but if it is the same as an EN I posted many months ago there is a tapping cycle simulating for example 2 minutes at 45 degrees at 7am then 5 minutes at another temp at 7:45 etc etc. If you search you might find ot if it was in this forum. It may well have been in the CC I don't recall. On leave, no access to it at the moment but that's how it's done, over a days use.


Wonder if that's with or without preheat - intelligent or otherwise.
 
Just reminded me of a story told me by an ex boiler rep who stated the company used to use still warm boilers from previous cycles to improve efficiency (reduce heat up times). Not IG or a V.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top