You are repeating nonsense. You dispute the version of the charter I have posted from different sources and then you go on to mention it yourself. When queried what charter you are referring to it turns out to be the one I posted.
Make your mind up.
My mind is quite clear.
Let me deal with your points one at a time, which I've already dealt with before, which proves you don't read my comments.
You are repeating nonsense. You dispute the version of the charter I have posted from different sources and then you go on to mention it yourself.
I'm not disputing the version of what you present, what I am saying, and what you are not understanding, is that these versions are the output of Israel, US and UK sources. Therefore they cannnot be relied on to be accurate. I've already discussed this.
I've previously mentioned how the translation of the bible produces many versions. When I'm translating English to French and vce versa, there are many options, many words to choose from. I did mention just the other day, where 'âme'' was translated as 'heart', but I would have translated it as 'soul' A few words here, a few words there can change the whole sentiment of the document.
I suspect that the MEE version is also from the Israel/US version.
So I can't say the version that is circulated in the west is wrong. We don't know because we can't access the original, or even a reliable translated version..
So stop confusing yourself and accept that the internet is awash with misinformation. Why do you think a Hamas document would not be affected?
When queried what charter you are referring to it turns out to be the one I posted.
Because it's the only one we can access, it's the only one available in English, so we have to work with that one.
Now do you understand?
You haven't (you claim). Therefore you cannot claim to know what the aims of Hamas are.
I have worked with the only version that we can access, and deduced from that version what Hamas's aims with that charter are.
You claimed they were contradictory. I clarified it for you and showed how they are not necessarily contradictory. Perhaps you don't remember or never read it.
I mentioned the situation of American indigenous people living in (nearly) harmony with white and non-white descendants of immigrants.
I also mentioned Canadians/Alaskans living side by side with Inuits. (perhaps you remember that discussion?)
I'm sure there's many more examples, e.g the multi-national international aspects of places like Hong Kong,
So different ethnicities can live side by side in peace.
That is what the Hamas charter (the only one we can access) is suggesting.
I'll repeat it here for you. I do find I have to repeat myself often.
The Hamas charter (the only one we can access) suggests the whole of Israel being available for Palestinians and Israelis to live side by side in peace and relative harmony. And the UN resolution as far as Jerusalem is concenred is for it to be respected, i.e equally shared.
The one bone of contention would be that Palestinians don't recognise Israel as a state. It was created by forcibly taking the land from Palestinians.
In comparison, Israel would accept Palestinians living side by side with Israelis in peace and harmony, except that the Israel Declaration allows for apartheid to be legally applied. That would exclude Palestinians from any government, and make them second class citizens.
The real problem is the propganda and misinformation put out by various sources, e.g Israelis argue that Hamas want Israel off the face of the earth, and Hamas argue that the Zionists among the Israelis want Palestinians off the face of the earth.
Hamas does wnat the state of Israel to be dismantled and replaced by a Palestinian state. But it does not exclude Israelis from continued living in peace and harmony in Palestine.
Does that clarify it for you, albeit it is my understanding of the only version of the Hamas charter that we can access.
www.wsj.com
