Himmie suffers from a missing link….
Himmie suffers from a missing link….
They want to eradicate the Palestinians as a nation.Israel don't have a stated aim of eradicating Palestinians
They did in 1993 with the Oslo accords, the then foreign minister Shimon Peres negotiated with the PLOIsrael will never accept a Palestinian state
I agree with that to a certain extent.If Hamas laid down their weapons there would be a basis for a long term settlement. If Israel laid down their weapons then Hamas would move in and kill all Jews, as per their stated God backed aim. Hardly equal outcomes
Where have they said that?They want to eradicate the Palestinians as a nation.
Slight correction - Himmie is the missing linkHimmie suffers from a missing link….
Where have they said that?
Zionists do. (want to destroy the Palestinians)
Politics in Israel are dominated by Zionist parties.
Politics of Israel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
According to Elaine Hagopian, in the early decades it foresaw the homeland of the Jews as extending not only over the region of Palestine, but into Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Egypt, with its borders more or less coinciding with the major riverine and water-rich areas of the Levant.
The problem is that many have conflated criticism of Israel as anti-Semitic, which is nonsense.Interesting.. you'd think after all the antisemitic issues the party has had with the previous leadership, Labour MPs would be a bit less careless. I give Starmer his due, he's tried bl**dy hard to tackle it in his party.
Andy McDonald: Labour suspends MP after speech at pro-Palestinian rally
The party says comments made by Andy McDonald at the weekend were "deeply offensive".www.bbc.co.uk
The harm caused by dehumanising language
You're right.You quoted a link about freedom of movement
I said “plenty of people in Gaza work in Israel
the 2 are not the same.
Legality of restrictions
The right to freedom of movement within states is recognized in article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948.
B'Tselem has argued that the consequences of the restrictions on the economic status Palestinian population have been so severe that they breach the rights guaranteed by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—in particular, the right to a livelihood, the right to an acceptable standard of living, the right to satisfactory nutrition, clothing, and housing, and the right to attain the best standard of physical and mental health.[32]
B'Tselem also argues that the restrictions on ill, wounded and pregnant Palestinians seeking acute medical care is in contravention of international law that states that medical professionals and the sick must be granted open passage.
Are you trying to cover up your racist comment about immigrants eating pet food.although this is coming from from someone who think bird seed and dog food are the same….I hope you don’t have any pets
I’ve reported you for hate speech!View attachment 319119
Sorry for addressing your point in this thread when it was posted in the other thread, but I'm still excluded from that thread, and I thought your comment (especially the bit highlighted) deserved a response.
(I see I've been excluded from another thread, (Is Jewish and /or Zionism a racist ideology). No explanation as usual, and Motorbiking claims he doesn't go running off to the mods. )
I've said repeatedly that the designation of an organistion as terrorist is a political ploy, partly to justify the treatment of the members of the designated "terrorist" organisation.
A very real problem really emphasises this political ploy when the organisation is conflated with the general population, as in Gaza when Palestinians are conflated with Hamas. It is intended to justify the treatment of Gazans in general.
There's an excellent piece in the BBC news this moring referrring to this labelling of people.
If anyone doubts the political motivation of labelling an organisation as 'terrorist', I refer you to the labelling of the Mau mau as a terrorist organisation in the 1950's. A label renounced in 2003, when the Mau mau were recognised as Freedom fighters, In 2013 UK paid out £20M in reparations to those Mau mau fighters still alive.
Again in the BBC news today.
King Charles Kenya trip: Mau Mau uprising hangs over visit
The British Empire brutally suppressed an uprising in Kenya in the 1950s. Its victims cannot forget.www.bbc.com