It's OK to kill journalists

How about those who sponsor Hamas.

Iran = stoning women
Russia = who invented the building throw.
How about :rolleyes:
Is your name transam, he's full of whatabouteries. :rolleyes:

Here's a 'what about' you won't like:
What about your undying support for killers of women and children?
Or what about the ones denying food and water to starving children?
What about the ones denying medicine to hospitals so that children have to have amputations without anesthetic or disinfectant?
Or even worse what about those bombing hopsitals where the children, who had amputations without anesthetic, are lying in their hospital beds, starving, in pain, waiting to be bombed?
 
Sponsored Links
The Egyptians welcomed the Nazis during WW2.
Motorbiking has a history of making up false news stories.
Several time she's been asked about media sources that he's quoted, then failed to presen these media sources.
He's even invented air support in one article. But there was no air support mentioned in all relevant articles. Yet he still insists, against all the evidence, that there was air support.
So anything motorbiking says has to be taken witht a large dose of salt.
 
Or suggest they have a collection of nazi memorabilia, to make out they are a fascist and avoid attention on your own jew hating.

but you wouldn't do that.... oh wait...
Bringing attention to the indiscriminate killing of women and chilkdren, the denial of food, water, medicine, access to safe areas, etc, by Israelis is borne out of hatred for Jews. It's borne out of morality and decency. Something that is obviously lacking in those individuals that support such inhumane mass murder, currently conducted by Israelis. All governments and individuals that support such action of their government, irrespective of their ethnicity, nationality or geographical location should be united in condemning such genocide, not seeking to justify due one incident in a decades long conflict.
Arguing against such atrocities as mass murder, with its supporters, is not an ethnicity argument. Only those seeking to justify genocide make it a racist issue.
Obviously the vast majority of Jews will support the genocide currently conducted by Israel. But not all Israelis are Jews, not all Jews are Israeli. Not all Jews support the current action of the Israeli government.
So it is NOT an ethnicity issue. The current conduct is conducted by israel, not by Jews. Jewish is not a state. They don't have a government. Jewish is an ethno-religion, not just within Israel.
Using anti-semitism as a shield against the current conduct of Israel would be like arguing that someone hates all British, based on the current behaviour of the Tory government.
Or that someone hates all Spaniards because the Spanish allow bullfighting in some regions.
Or that someone hates all French based on some anecdote about pigeons.
You see how absurd it is when a different natinality is substituted.

Bod.. and others enjoy telling us how ethnicaly diverse Israel is, so criticising Israel cannot be antisemitic.
 
A man who supports Russia and Iran as well as other Muslim states that murder journalists mothers fathers and their children is a little strange in thinking.
Muslim states, nor Russia are not the only ones killing women and children.
Neither John nor I, nor anyonbe else has expressed support for any nation killing women and children, except for those currenlty trying to justify Israel's indiscriminate killing of over 23,000 Palestinians.
 
Sponsored Links
Arab countries don't want Palestinian refugees because they know they will be infested with Hamas and IS terrorists, they've seen what happened in other Arab countries who took in Palestinians. Of course, there will be decent Palestinians who want peace, but how do you tell the difference.





In short, nobody wants them because they are infested with Hamas and IS, wherever they go they will bring murder and bloodshed, they already have form for this in Jordan. Israel are prepared to look at a two state solution but only after Hamas are destroyed, any peace deal will be dependent on Israel taking care of 'security'.

Nobody wants them. Egypt don't want to jeopardise 40 years of peace with Israel, and Jordan certainly doesn't want a repeat of the 1970's Black September.
The fake news according to a POTUS hopeful. :rolleyes:
And sillyboy pretends it's news. :rolleyes:
The US presidential hopeful Nikki Haley made a strong point when she asked the Islamic countries why they are not opening up their gates for Palestinian civilians from Gaza who want to flee their homes amid the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas.
She claimed that the Arab nations are not allowing the Palestinians because they know they "can't vet them" and they don't want "Hamas in their neighbourhood," asserting that "if Arab nations don't want them, then why would Israel? "

Nimrata "Nikki" Randhawa Haley is the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations serving in the Trump administration from 2017 to 2018.

She was trying to out-trump the Trump. :rolleyes:

Sillyboy is so far up his own confirmation bias, he doesn't realise he's reading fake news.

The laughable bit is that sillyboy's second link completely refutes his own claim and that of his first link. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
And he hasn't realised it.
 
The terrorists lose again. (y)
The 'defenders' have killed 23,000 'terrorists' so far, mostly women and children 'terrorists'.
A figure which you do not find disconcerting because they deserved it?
 
Again, not quite right, maybe a few hundred thousand Palestinians fled before the 1948 war knowing what was coming having rejected a two state solution, after the Arab countries invaded Israel in 1948 somewhere around 750,000 Palestinians were displaced, how many were expelled and how many just left nobody knows.
What we do know is the bulk of them went to Jordan where eventually in 1970 the PLO tried to take over Jordan.
Sillyboy re-writing history. :rolleyes:
 
What about yours?
I don't support the indiscriminate, nor the unofficial targetting, nor any official targetting of killing civilians of any age or gender.

You obviously do because you try to justify it frequently.
 
The Abraham Accords seeks to...

...'end radicalization and conflict to provide all children a better future.'

An interesting aim based upon Abraham's 'Founding of the Covenant' and the belief that the Jews are 'God's Chosen people'.

Peace - on whose terms?
 
The Abraham Accords?

In June 2023, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned Israel that rising tensions with the Palestinians, including through advancing settlement activity, threatened the expansion of normalization agreements with Arab nations, particularly Saudi Arabia. Speaking alongside Blinken earlier in June, the Saudi Foreign Minister had stated that "without finding a pathway to peace for the Palestinian people ... any normalization will have limited benefits.

Four months before the Hamas attack, the USA was warning Israel of the dangers of continued and increasing Israeli subjugation of Palestinians.
So no-one can say, honestly, the attack was complete surprise. :rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top