yes i didYou made no such post.
yes i didYou made no such post.
Evidence from accredited sources isn't enough for you - does all your news have to be read to you by a R4 newsreader...like a child?
I called odds out in post 485. He thinks 536 is a rebuttal?
It was nothing more than a doubling down on the attack.
Insults mocking religion. It’s deliberate
You think the words of Scripture are intended to incite hate crimes?I called odds out in post 485. He thinks 536 is a rebuttal?
It was nothing more than a doubling down on the attack.
Insults mocking religion. It’s deliberate
its easy to conclude he has a hatred toward the followers of religion A.
if its just one people who's religion that you mock
He's looking at it with a limited perception.Do you know that with certainty, or are you coming to that position from a limited dataset?
Don't they talk about the new PM on R4 or have they succumbed to little more than Ambridge gossip before Just a Minute arrives to brighten their days?BBC is an accredited source
So what’s Starmers take on the caper ?? Ref these journalists and genocide ?
You are easily lead like a a child
Suggesting those who follow religion A, to follow religion B, when B rejects the people and beliefs of A.Do you know that with certainty, or are you coming to that position from a limited dataset?
Suggesting those who follow religion A, to follow religion B, when B rejects the people and beliefs of A.
Its not aimed at all religions, is it.
Don't they talk about the new PM on R4 or have they succumbed to little more than Ambridge gossip before Just a Minute arrives to brighten their days?