No, it's obvious i have made no statement on his past behaviour - i have no knowledge of it.So you have hard, factual and verifiable evidence to support your claims and that you are not simply assuming??
It's obvious that you for some reason will never accept that he was an abuser, no matter how many people come forward to say that he was.
You're hiding behind the fact that he'll never be able to be brought to trial and have a jury convict him.
It's not me that's claiming he was an abuser, it's various women from different backgrounds. I believe them.
You can stay in lala land if you like.
However, based on your own comments, you have already decided - without any evidence or facts to show one way or the other.
Odd that you pillory others for showing the same tendencies.
Based on your comments and views, i'd say you really are a Sun reader afterall, just too scared to come forward and say it.