just seen the news

joe-90 said:
As the old saying goes:

Those that don't learn fom history's mistakes are doomed to repeat them.

Or an even older one...


The one thing we learn from history, is that we learn nothing from history!!
 
Sponsored Links
jbonding said:
I am saying the Lebanise people are persicuted by Hesbolah or do you honestly believe families are happy they are hid in their front rooms? i can see it now "excuse me lads, ive just decorated the front room you couldnt come back next week could you". How do i propose to sort it out,lol. Do you honestly think dangling a carrot to hesbolah hasnt been tried? Do you think they are interested in peace. They are terrorists who are holding a country captive and they need destroying and i think this is the only way, sadly a lot of innocent people are being killed. Do you think Hesbolah care about the civilians as much as you and i?

I believe many Lebanese people do fear Hesbollah, but also that there are many who sympathise and support them because of whom they oppose.....if the situation in the Middle East were improved, they would have much less support. I do not propose to employ incentive tactics to Hesbollah itself, but the people who might sympathise with them or even join them, their life-blood. Hesbollah is comprises of many people living in Lebanon and to think you can destroy them with bombs alone with all due respect I think is shortsighted. Would you have had the same approach in Ireland with the IRA or in Vietnam with the Vietcong? If you would, surely you could see that this would just strengthen their support. To fight against guerilla opponents is not so simple.

From what I know about them, I do not think Hesbollah are interested in peace and I do not think they care about civilians as much as you and I, but what I am saying is that the present approach will swell their ranks.

Now I have answered your questions frankly, but you do not seem to want to address mine, namely:

How would you address the almost universally condemned actions of Israel, apart from by the US and the UK at the moment?
 
noodlz said:
jbonding said:
I am saying the Lebanise people are persicuted by Hesbolah or do you honestly believe families are happy they are hid in their front rooms? i can see it now "excuse me lads, ive just decorated the front room you couldnt come back next week could you". How do i propose to sort it out,lol. Do you honestly think dangling a carrot to hesbolah hasnt been tried? Do you think they are interested in peace. They are terrorists who are holding a country captive and they need destroying and i think this is the only way, sadly a lot of innocent people are being killed. Do you think Hesbolah care about the civilians as much as you and i?

I believe many Lebanese people do fear Hesbollah, but also that there are many who sympathise and support them because of whom they oppose.....if the situation in the Middle East were improved, they would have much less support. I do not propose to employ incentive tactics to Hesbollah itself, but the people who might sympathise with them or even join them, their life-blood. Hesbollah is comprises of many people living in Lebanon and to think you can destroy them with bombs alone with all due respect I think is shortsighted. Would you have had the same approach in Ireland with the IRA or in Vietnam with the Vietcong? If you would, surely you could see that this would just strengthen their support. To fight against guerilla opponents is not so simple.

From what I know about them, I do not think Hesbollah are interested in peace and I do not think they care about civilians as much as you and I, but what I am saying is that the present approach will swell their ranks.

Now I have answered your questions frankly, but you do not seem to want to address mine, namely:

How would you address the almost universally condemned actions of Israel, apart from by the US and the UK at the moment?


LOL. They have had enough of hesbolah and that is it, I agree they should blow them off the planet. the USA have a war on terrorism just like the UK
and will not bow to terrorists. Some people on this forum dont get it, We all share this planet but some dont want to they want it all for themselves under the name or guise of islam. Wake up, innocent people are blown to bits daily, turn your telly on. Stop blaiming and giving reasons for these crazy bastards. They need killing one way or another and if people want to protect and hide them dont expect favours or support from me.
 
jbonding said:
LOL. They have had enough of hesbolah and that is it, I agree they should blow them off the planet.
How many children do you think it is acceptable for them to kill in the process?
 
Sponsored Links
ban-all-sheds said:
jbonding said:
LOL. They have had enough of hesbolah and that is it, I agree they should blow them off the planet.
How many children do you think it is acceptable for them to kill in the process?

None is acceptable, but innocent people are killed all the time. you keep asking the same question but wording it slightly different each time. Ill ask the same question to you regarding hesbolah How many children do you think it is acceptable for them to kill in the process?
 
jbonding said:
None is acceptable,
So is it right, therefore for people to post on this forum saying that it is acceptable?

Ill ask the same question to you regarding hesbolah How many children do you think it is acceptable for them to kill in the process?
None, of course.
 
ban-all-sheds said:
jbonding said:
None is acceptable,
So is it right, therefore for people to post on this forum saying that it is acceptable?
Ill ask the same question to you regarding hesbolah How many children do you think it is acceptable for them to kill in the process?
None, of course.


I dont think anyone thinks its acceptable just part of war, sad i know but its a fact of life. You refered to what someone said in a previous post, about dropping a bomb on Omar Bakri. Its a figure of speach, chill out. the amount of times people have said im gonna kill that little blighter when he gets home doesnt mean they are gonna kill them :eek: I will put a rocket up his arse doesnt really mean its gonna be done. I would die for a nice cold beer doesnt mean you would really like to die.
 
jbonding said:
I dont think anyone thinks its acceptable just part of war, sad i know but its a fact of life.
maybe if more people didn't just think it was 'sad' and a 'fact of life' there wouldn't be more wars - just a thought.. ;)
 
ellal said:
jbonding said:
I dont think anyone thinks its acceptable just part of war, sad i know but its a fact of life.
maybe if more people didn't just think it was 'sad' and a 'fact of life' there wouldn't be more wars - just a thought.. ;)

there will always be wars another sad fact of life ;)
 
jbonding said:
LOL. They have had enough of hesbolah and that is it, I agree they should blow them off the planet. the USA have a war on terrorism just like the UK
and will not bow to terrorists. Some people on this forum dont get it, We all share this planet but some dont want to they want it all for themselves under the name or guise of islam. Wake up, innocent people are blown to bits daily, turn your telly on. Stop blaiming and giving reasons for these crazy b*****d. They need killing one way or another and if people want to protect and hide them dont expect favours or support from me.

If only international relations were as simple to resolve.

Should the British government have blown the IRA off the planet or the Americans the Vietcong? Do you not see that this blunderbuss approach only enables the hydra-headed monster to grow?

I do find it difficult to buy into this claim that the USA has a war on terrorism. If this were truly the case it would not have used much of its active military resources to invade Iraq this time around (and just so that you know that I'm not a pacifist, I do think, from what I know of the situation, that the first gulf war was much more justifiable). The link to international terrorism and Iraq is vague. Yes, Sadaam Hussein was a vicious dictator who terrorised his own people and on humanitarian grounds something should have been done about him as well as many other tyrants, but to claim it is in the fight against terrorism is hollow.

Surely, if there was a sincere "war on terror", which is a nebulous notion really, most resources would be devoted to preventing further attacks and to do so one must find out what makes a terrorist.

Where do the terrorists come from? (The term "terrorist" really is an unhelpful one as Johnny-t most eloquently described in a post I fear has now been deleted?)

Do you know how many (the vast majority) of the September 11th hijackers were nationals of one country alone? (It wasn't Iraq, Lebanon or Palestine, by the way)

Why does America not target that country? Even if it were a deliberate ploy by Bin Laden and his organisation in an attempt to tarnish this country, it still shows there are a lot of dissaffected people who can be manipulated to extremes.

In terms of International terrorism Iran was always a more dangerous breeding ground than Iraq, but now the US/UK's ability to diminish this threat has been hurt by their own folly in Iraq.

Syria should've even been ahead of Iraq in a pecking order of rogue states that endanger world safety.

Afghanistan, a major hub of international terrorism, has not transformed, is still an extremely dangerous place, with Bin Laden apparently still at large and more terrorists being indoctrinated and trained there. Similarly, with its border country, Pakistan, there are still terrorist training camps there yet America does not shut them down. Pakistan is one country that actually benefitted from the aftermath of September 11th. At the time it was a rogue state with a dictator who had taken over by military coup, not recognised by most of the world, yet soon after its strategic importance meant millions of dollars poured into the country.

The injustices of the Middle East situation is used by extremists as a recruiting sergeant for would-be terrorists. Resolve this situation, as Sharron actually may have been trying to do with Israel's giving up of the disputed occupied territories, and terrorism would diminish.

The rich and powerful of West and East setting up schools especially for the poor in third world countries could have enormous long-term positive effects. At the moment many parents cannot afford to send their children to traditional schools and instead send them to the much cheaper madrassas (religious schools) which, if not militarily training them, will be more likely to indoctrinate hatred towards the West and so the seeds for future extremists.
 
jbonding said:
You refered to what someone said in a previous post, about dropping a bomb on Omar Bakri. Its a figure of speach
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
 
ban-all-sheds said:
jbonding said:
You refered to what someone said in a previous post, about dropping a bomb on Omar Bakri. Its a figure of speach
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?
It is not a figure of speech, it is saying that children should be killed. Do you get it now?


No i dont get it, I would drop a bomb on Omar Bakris head personally. hes in the middle of a desert on his own with no women or children about ;) Its interesting how these countries use their women and children as shields. I can guarantee if you watch the news women and children (especially women) are only ever seen when a bomb has gone off. if there is any kind of protest look about you wont see a single women only when theirs been a bomb.Any time you switch to TV on just take note of the incident, Whether its a man moment or tragedy, someone go and get a couple of women and children the BBC cameras have arrived. The same can go for illegal immigrants, take note 20/30 year old men :eek: Wheres all the women :eek:
 
jbonding said:
No i dont get it,
That comes as no surprise....

I would drop a bomb on Omar Bakris head personally. hes in the middle of a desert on his own with no women or children about ;)
Is he? What makes you sure of that?

Would you still drop the bomb if he was in a city/town/village?

Its interesting how these countries use their women and children as shields. I can guarantee if you watch the news women and children (especially women) are only ever seen when a bomb has gone off. if there is any kind of protest look about you wont see a single women only when theirs been a bomb.Any time you switch to TV on just take note of the incident, Whether its a man moment or tragedy, someone go and get a couple of women and children the BBC cameras have arrived. The same can go for illegal immigrants, take note 20/30 year old men :eek: Wheres all the women :eek:
And your point is?
 
There's no getting away from it Israel is killing innocent people in the name of democracy! No one can say it's a justifiable means to an end and Israel are obviously using this conflict as an excuse to exterminate not just the soldiers but civilians too, all they are doing is creating a new generation of people who will fight them and despise them for their actions.

Any civilised country would say enough is enough and strive for a diplomatic solution instead of trying to crush their opponents by any means regardless of cost.

Israel should cease fire today and in a few days if the attack on Israel hasn't stopped then it should appeal to the UN for help no go and try out all their latest technology to see how many people they can kill regardless of whether they are innocent or aggressor.

Shame on the USA and the UK for not stepping in and stopping this bloodshed, makes you ashamed to be a citizen of either of these countries!
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top