Just a real quickie for now 'cos I'm busy today:
GD translation:
EFLimpudence has kicked my ass.
Just a real quickie for now 'cos I'm busy today:
Just to make my position clear:
2. I think the Geneva Convention is an excellent arrangement...
...as long as both sides are signatories. If not, we should not feel the need to have our hands tied behind our backs by it.
Funnily enough thats what the nazis thought...After all, how could 'jews' be signatories as a whole?
(and yes there were signed protocols before 1949 when the term 'convention' was ultimately coined!)
Thank you for reinforcing my point...Just to make my position clear:
2. I think the Geneva Convention is an excellent arrangement...
...as long as both sides are signatories. If not, we should not feel the need to have our hands tied behind our backs by it.
Funnily enough thats what the nazis thought...After all, how could 'jews' be signatories as a whole?
(and yes there were signed protocols before 1949 when the term 'convention' was ultimately coined!)
A nonsensical comparison, if I may be so bold. The Jews were non-combatants so of course they were not signatories to the GC.
If a non-signatory to the GC wants to benefit from the provisions of the GC, it should also sign - and abide by - the Convention.
Thank you for reinforcing my point...Just to make my position clear:
2. I think the Geneva Convention is an excellent arrangement...
...as long as both sides are signatories. If not, we should not feel the need to have our hands tied behind our backs by it.
Funnily enough thats what the nazis thought...After all, how could 'jews' be signatories as a whole?
(and yes there were signed protocols before 1949 when the term 'convention' was ultimately coined!)
A nonsensical comparison, if I may be so bold. The Jews were non-combatants so of course they were not signatories to the GC.
If a non-signatory to the GC wants to benefit from the provisions of the GC, it should also sign - and abide by - the Convention.
Although obviously you don't quite get it yet...
*Oh yes he will...Well I look forward to his response (he won't*), because I confess that I don't know what he's getting at.
Just a real quickie for now 'cos I'm busy today:
GD translation:
EFLimpudence has kicked my ass.
Harsh fact is that there is price to be paid to keep "here" like it is and "there" over "there". Clearly it works as people from "there" keep coming "here" but no one "here" wants to go "there". Enjoy being "here" and be grateful to those who try to maintain "here". If anyone is that narked by how we protect "here" maybe they could fek off over "there".
All figurative of course. No race or religious hate intended just a deep love of good old blighty! Maybe we should all embrace the land we live in and thank our gods that we are "here" and not "there", wherever "there" is.
Happy Christmas to you all!!!!
You don't half talk some rubbish at times Dex.
You don't know what I'm 'getting at' because you are too thick to realise that what you said vindicates my point...
But hey ho...you carry on showing yourself up.
Softus would be proud of his latest disciple...