Lawrence Fox is a total loser

In this case it's doing both.

The recipient is being sent materials to harass them (making them the victim) and they're also the person pictured and would under current law have been the victim of up skirting. But since it predates that law the up skirting wasnt illegal.
He didn’t take the picture. So even if upskirting had been illegal, it wouldn’t fit.
 
Angel Raynor - woman - not charged with anything - hounded by MBK, contorting himself gymnastically in an attempt to show her guilt

Lawrence Fox - male - charged with a crime - MBK contorts himself spectacularly in order to exonerate.

Misogyny is strong with this one.
 
Angel Raynor - woman - not charged with anything - hounded by MBK, contorting himself gymnastically in an attempt to show her guilt

Lawrence Fox - male - charged with a crime - MBK contorts himself spectacularly in order to exonerate.

Misogyny is strong with this one.
Nosenout - forum troll and liar.

I have not exonerated Lawrence fox.

Getting away with it does not make you innocent.
When an offence is out of time, the offender cannot be prosecuted.
When an under payment of tax is out of time, the HMRC cannot collect it.
 
Getting away with it does not make you innocent.
When an offence is out of time, the offender cannot be prosecuted.
When an under payment of tax is out of time, the HMRC cannot collect it.
Still contorting - still trying his best (and still failing).

Misogyny alive and prospering.
 
Last edited:
MBK dislikes many of the same things that Fox dislikes. I doubt he would approve of many of his actions though. Posting up swastikas, painting your children in blackface and posting up skirt shots on twitter makes him a difficult person to support.
 
MBK dislikes many of the same things that Fox dislikes. I doubt he would approve of many of his actions though. Posting up swastikas, painting your children in blackface and posting up skirt shots on twitter makes him a difficult person to support.
I don't know what he likes or dislikes, I just don't find him interesting.
 
I posted to answer a question:
What's the penalty for an offence of this nature?, sounds like he might be looking at a custodial sentence.
Then I corrected a lack of understanding:
He wouldn't have to take the photo, sharing it is enough.
and we discussed it for a few pages.

I don't need to know anything about a person, to discuss a matter.

I suspect you don't need to know what coffee is in the machine, when you change the backup tapes
 
Back
Top