I'm not going to get into a long argument with you, as you are a habitual troll.
I'm hardly an advocate of the multicultural society. Not a secret.
So you are suggesting that your viewpoint is acceptable, but because mine isn't, I'm a troll.
Indicative of the intelligence of your ilk, I suspect.
It isn't necessary, workable or in the best interests of the 'host' population, who had it forced on them. No political party mentioned the promotion of virtual open-door immigration in their manifesto - and no one voted for the increasingly unsustainable and sometimes dangerous situation that we find ourselves in.
So why not follow the democratic process and discuss it with your represenatives instead of stiring up racial hatred on forums?
One method is legal, acceptable and responsible, the other is bordering on the illegal, is unaceptable and irresponsible. I'll leave you to work out which is which.
In addition, you suggest that the policy-makers have caused a situation so you ferment racial unrest against the migrants, rather than discussing it with the policy-makers.
With this in mind, I am hardly likely to be interested in the problems and struggles of the etnics. They certainly ain't interested in our problems.
So you, apathetically, turn a blind eye to the injustices throughout the world, whenever ethnic violence is concerned? OOps, sorry. no, you aren't apathetic, you actually support ethnic violence. You demonstrate this by encouraging racial hatred.
The only people winding themselves up into a state of hysterical, righteous indignation are the lefty bleeding-hearts like you.
Suppose we have a sense of moral indignation when people are formenting racial hatred, as well? If that's being "lefty" then bring it on.
Whilst you're out there looking for 'causes', how about a 'young man murdered by several racists', in a cowardly, despicable and savage way on the streets of London? Justice not served. Remember PC Blakelock?
Suppose that's different? Not exactly a cause-celebre for the hard-wringing brigade.
It is exactly a cause for the "hand-wringing brigade" because of the underlying cause of the murder of PC Blakelock.
You're obviously not well informed, (possibly becasue you don't give a toss, but you still arrive at assumptions based on your limited knowledge). So allow me to enlighten you.
The riots, during which PC Blakelock was murdered, was brought about by police racist approach to the black community, which, in the black community's opinion, resulted in several deaths of black people in police custody. These deaths were not investigated. Moreover, that attitude and approach of the police did not change. The most recent death, immediately before the riots, was a young black female. It was later detetermined that she died of a heart attack (We'll probably never know if that was accurate or not).
This lead to the riots. The black people viewed the police as racist. We now realise that it was understandable and probably accurate.
PC Blakelock was murdered during this rioting. What were the factors leading to his death?
More importantly, as Micilin indicated, the police coruption and incompetence fermented the racial tension futher.
Perhaps you should read the history of such events before jumping to conclusions or making invalid assumptions or comparisons.
Then, ask yourself, what was the real cause for racial tension between the various groups and the police in the London area.
Was it the inherent attitude of the individuals in the police force, or the attitude of individuals in the community?
Then, consider, who had the power to change the outcome? If only they'd realised at the time where their attitudes were leading.
