JamesG said:
I'm somewhat puzzled by the quote refering to component being inferior to RGB. Inferior in what sense? Simplicity? Quality? Availability? As any novice who works with displays and they will tell you how superior component is over RGB.
Being pedantic, RGB is also component video, but of course what has been come to be termed "Component video" is the Y, Pb, Pr 3xRCA phono connector standard.
I should have been more specific: RGB is superior in terms of quality. It is a matter of bandwidth. With an RGB scart system, the video signal is sent to the display along three conductors, with a fourth for sync purposes. Displays work on red green and blue, so there is no conversion required in order to display the picture. The red conductor controls the red pixels, and so forth.
With component video, the Y/Pb/Pr signal has to be converted to RGB values at the display.
I am not sure if DVDs store video in an RGB format or a Y/Pb/Pr format, or if it can be either. If it is RGB, then RGB connection is superior because you maintain the separate colour signals all the way from the DAC to the display. If it is stored in Y/Pb/Pr format then the difference between RGB and Y/Pb/Pr is less, because conversion will still have to take place either way, but RGB would still win out because you are converting your (analogue) video signals earlier.
Y/Pb/Pr isn't really pure component video. Green has to be reconstructed from the three signals, which means that green information is therefore composited with the other three signals.
The reason Y/Pb/Pr is becoming popular is one of bandwidth and signal quality. Due to the lower quality of the video
less bandwidth is required, thus cables are cheaper and easier to make.