How come the deportation rate has dropped off?43% of all claims are rejected on the basis of a safe 3rd country
How come the deportation rate has dropped off?43% of all claims are rejected on the basis of a safe 3rd country
Original text:Only updated by that clause, end of June or July 2022.
Country of origin has changed a bit, we don't have Dublin convention any more, a lot go underground due to criminal networks.. and the government is having difficulty getting a solution through the legal system. We also have a large well funded "human rights" legal industry which is getting abused. Though, thats due to change.How come the deportation rate has dropped off?
so it's easy to refuse the application and deport then?Original text:
(2)If, in coming from the country where his life or freedom was threatened, the refugee stopped in another country outside the United Kingdom, subsection (1) applies only if he shows that he could not reasonably have expected to be given protection under the Refugee Convention in that other country.
Its been like this. for 20+ years
Country of origin has changed a bit, we don't have Dublin convention any more, a lot go underground due to criminal networks.. and the government is having difficulty getting a solution through the legal system. We also have a large well funded "human rights" legal industry which is getting abused. Though, thats due to change.
The greeks use clandestine push back teams, which we could try, but that wouldn't be "British".
I don't get angry, sorry if i gave you that impression.Vinty has failed to find a law, so, like an angry monkey, he resorts to flinging his dung.
What next, Cannibalism.?The was a spate of disembowelment going on in the capital, is it still on the go, ceased, or not reported?
Link gives you a flavour.
Six arrests after teen boy 'disemboweled' as four stabbed on estate
One boy is in a critical condition and another is seriously ill after four teenagers were stabbed on a south London housing estate.www.yorkshirepost.co.uk
So it hasn't been acted upon for the last 20+ years?Original text:
(2)If, in coming from the country where his life or freedom was threatened, the refugee stopped in another country outside the United Kingdom, subsection (1) applies only if he shows that he could not reasonably have expected to be given protection under the Refugee Convention in that other country.
Its been like this. for 20+ years
Where did i say it was the only criteria?.No. But you framed it as the ONLY criteria for seeking asylum. Wrong.
And there is the nub. It is way more complicated than 1 section on its ownWhere did i say it was the only criteria?.
I just pointed out that a lot of these illegals crossing the channel would have their claim for refugee status rejected under Article 31.
But the first time it was tried to deport them, the ECHR determined it was in contravention of the Charter.Where did i say it was the only criteria?.
I just pointed out that a lot of these illegals crossing the channel would have their claim for refugee status rejected under Article 31.
So why was the flight stopped, if it was not in contravention of the ECHR charter?Not quite - they said the UK should wait until 3 weeks after the judicial review. They haven't said the policy is illegal. Would you like the text so you can read it?
Glad you cleared that up. Agree there are many influences and not just an unsafe country.Where did i say it was the only criteria?.
I just pointed out that a lot of these illegals crossing the channel would have their claim for refugee status rejected under Article 31.
Why isn't that working then?Its been like this. for 20+ years