There aren't any, anywhere. You will find it in an engine with coolant leak. My pattern was short journeys only. Now I deliberately drive longer distances. Not because of oil, but because of battery going flat.
Depends where the coolant is leaking. If it's a radiator, it won't have anything to do with it. If it's a head gasket or cracked head where water can pass from the cooling jacket to the engine, then yes, that's one cause of it. However, it is not the only cause. I bought my current old car about a decade ago. It had been stored for at least 5 years before that. My heart sank when the seller said "...but don't worry, I've run it up for 10 minutes every week to keep the oil well circulated". Sure enough, when I got it home and took the cam covers off, it was absolutely thick with mayonnaise. I was scooping it out with Mrs. Avocet's tablespoon! It's a horrendously cruel thing to do to an engine.
I am quite sure you said oil gets thin. Maybe, it was someone else. Anyway it was thick enough to be good oil.
I said oil gets thin when the engine doesn't get hot enough for long enough to evaporate the unburned fuel out of it. Other than that, cars that have been neglected when it comes to oil changes, tend to have yucky, thick, sludgy oil. (As you have just observed). It was
YOU, in the other thread, who claimed that old oil was "good stuff and gave higher MPG"...
The can maker never threatened me my car will blow as often, so I believe them more. In any case, I believe more of what I can see. I saw thickish black oil and I believed.
This was about the can maker vs. the eBay seller. I didn't mention the car maker. That's something you've just brought in now, despite it having nothng to do with your previous statement. However, sicne you mention it, I still see that you're not one to believe anything that you don't want to hear...
The car maker won't have told you that your car will "blow". He will have told you about a specific fault that DVSA consider serious enough to warrant a recall. You, of course, are bound to know better...
. Obviously, if the car does suffer whatever failure they were trying to warn you about in the recall and it takes you with it, that would be poetic justice or "karma" as the kid call it. My concern, would be if it caused the death or injury of an innocent person. It's thanks to people like you that DVSA will probably go ahead their plans for making ignored recalls an MOT fail. For the rest of us, that'll just mean some extra, irritating red tape. Take a bow...
If the engine can do 200k miles, minus 10's k miles, I would still never reach it before MOT fails the car for rust.
Don't see why? I got 248,000 out of my last car before I scrapped it. I still have the engine in the shed as a spare. But hey... it's your car...
On the plus side, I guess if your engine seizes as a result of your chronic neglect before the rust kills it, you could always go to a scrapper and get a good engine out of a rusty one that someone hasn't neglected so badly! I pity the poor sod who goes to the scrapper and buys the engie out of your rusty one as a spare...