B
Bodd
No one's holding vigils and riots for Sabina though, unlike the woman who was killed by the cop
You must have missed the massive one on friday night in Kidbrooke
No one's holding vigils and riots for Sabina though, unlike the woman who was killed by the cop
You may be right, you may be wrong.
For someone who gives judgemental opinions based on ignorance of the matter, I would not place a great deal of reliability on your opinion.
You must have missed the massive one on friday night in Kidbrooke
As I said apologies I didn't read the article in its entirety.
However it's not been as big news that vigils were held as the previous one.
Your original piece was about newsworthiness, not whether vigils take place or not.What about all these young black lads being murdered. Are they getting 1000s turn out for vigils.... is that because they or male.
What about the Mum her two children and the schoolfriend?
Are there any murders that don't hit the national news we don't here about at all?
Perhaps the attempts by the police to prevent the vigils in the Sarah Everard case added to the news worthiness?
Especially in light of the fact that she was killed by a policeman.
That makes two news items, not just one, the second item being much more newsworthy than the other.
It still does not excuse your judgemental opinion based on ignorance.
I seldom watch the news on those channels so I have no idea how they were covering the stories, were they like the beeb with the focus being mainly on the non white woman ?It was on ITV, C4, C5 why not include them too?
In the Sarah Everard case the were two or three connected issues:No judgemental opinion.
Just an observation that it's not as big a deal as with the everard case.
I incorrectly assumed a vigil wasn't created, because it simply hasn't been reported as much.
Which kinda proves the point of this thread..
I worked for a fella who knew of the family's. They were children of gangsters. Not very nice people. The two who went down were just mates who did not have gangster dads.
And do you think the police knew that from the moment they first turned up?
And made a conscious decision not to take it seriously because they're scared of criminals?
Or was it because the thing immediately obvious from the moment they first turned up was that the victim was a black lad?
Apparently he wasn't as innocent as media have made out....
Apparently the Hillsborough victims were also smeared in an attempt to reduce public sympathy.