More than 50% English are racist

[Slogger]

? love of killing ?? where do i say that ?


i will dish out justice in the form of the death penalty but i dont love killing ?

i know you wont put to death anyone no matter what there crime and for that i feel sorry for you as that is a sign no the evil nutters that the worset thing to happen to them will be incarceation


a poll now would show the vast majority of the uk citizens want the death penalty for certain crimes

some of us have the courage to say what we mean others hide behind veils of pomposity and liberism afraid to allow there true emotions to come out

 

[noodlz]

a poll now would show the vast majority of the uk citizens want the death penalty for certain crimes

Winston Churchill said, "The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter."

This obviously doesn't apply to you Slogger as you are not average, neither would five minutes be needed...30 seconds of listening to you would be enough.

 

[kendor]

a poll now would show the vast majority of the uk citizens want the death penalty for certain crimes

What like stirring up racial hatred?

 

[Slogger]

 

[Slogger]

a poll now would show the vast majority of the uk citizens want the death penalty for certain crimes

What like stirring up racial hatred?

where does the above post of mine refer to race >>


are you trying to cause trouble

would you allow child killers and terrorists to live ? shame is yours

 

[ban-all-sheds]

? love of killing ?? where do i say that ?


i will dish out justice in the form of the death penalty but i dont love killing ?

It is such an abhorrent act, and beset with so many difficulties, that you would have to love it to even contemplate it.

i know you wont put to death anyone no matter what there crime and for that i feel sorry for you as that is a sign no the evil nutters that the worset thing to happen to them will be incarceation

If you really believe that the "evil nutters" as you call them make that calcultion then you are either even harder of thinking than I believed, or you are telling yourself lies in order to feed your killing lust.

a poll now would show the vast majority of the uk citizens want the death penalty for certain crimes

That doesn't make it right.

some of us have the courage to say what we mean others hide behind veils of pomposity and liberism afraid to allow there true emotions to come out

Not I, but when I let my true emotions concerning you come out the Mods delete them.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

would you allow child killers and terrorists to live ? shame is yours

No - the shame is yours for wanting the state to lower itself to the same depths of moral turpitude and kill people because it doesn't like them.

 

[Slogger]

would you allow child killers and terrorists to live ? shame is yours

No - the shame is yours for wanting the state to lower itself to the same depths of moral turpitude and kill people because it doesn't like them.

NO you should feel ashamed of yourself

how many parents have been denied having there children to hold and cuddle just because some sick perv thinks he or she has the right to take them and use them as toys then kill them


the DEATH PENALTY is quick and simple and cost effective also it allows those that lost loved ones to see the perprators lives ended


its called JUSTICE you kill then you will be killed


i am trying to understand your view point but i cant see past the crime the pervets have done they need to be exterminated

 

[Softus]

how many parents have been denied having there children to hold and cuddle just because some sick perv thinks he or she has the right to take them and use them as toys then kill them

Too many. What's your point?

the DEATH PENALTY is quick and simple and cost effective also it allows those that lost loved ones to see the perprators lives ended

So quick and simple that a miscarriage of justice cannot be corrected.

its called JUSTICE you kill then you will be killed

And what about those who would be put to death when they didn't kill, i.e. when they were wrongfully convicted?

i am trying to understand your view point but i cant see past the crime the pervets have done they need to be exterminated

If you want to start to understand, then please explain how you would tell the difference between those who were rightfully convicted and those who were wrongfully convicted. This is a little mental warm-up routine before the main event, which is to explain how you can justify the act of killing as a punishment for an act that you believe to be unacceptable, i.e. that of killing.

 

[hermes]

the death penalty would only be used if the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt

)

In 1999 Angela Cannings was jailed for life for killing her children, who had died in their cots. Along with Sally Clark and Trupti Patel she was arrested based on the evidence of Professor Roy Meadow. This medical evidence showed that they were guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence was flawed and Meadow was later struck off the medical register but not until Cannings had spent 2 years imprisoned. If you had your way slogger, these women would have been executed even though they were innocent.

MOD2

calm it down and i will unlock it just ask

 

[Slogger]

so lets just HANG those caught in the act for a start eh is that ok


ie caught with the body or caught in the act is that ok oh you liberal one u

 

[Softus]

so lets just HANG those caught in the act for a start eh is that ok


ie caught with the body or caught in the act is that ok oh you liberal one u

So, let's clarify your points:

1. You advocate hanging people who are caught red-handed.
2. You are asking anyone else thinks it's acceptable to hang someone who is not caught red-handed.
3. You appers to think that the only evidence that can lead to a safe conviction is to be caught red-handed.

I thought I'd made my opinion clear, so I don't know why you didn't understand it, but I advocate NOT hanging, for any offence, no matter how severe, and the reasoning behind my opinion (in stark contrast to the lack of reasoning behind yours) is that capital punishment carries the risk of killing innocent people. Since you claim that killing is the only just punishment for a killer, it seems odd to me that you can accept this risk, since it erode the significance of the punishment if were meted out to innocent people.

I happen to believe, for other reasons, that capital punishment is not an answer, but it's the only one that I thought you were capable of understanding.

Clearly I misjudged you; see how easily it happens?

 

[Slogger]

i really think you lot that dont want the death penalty have something to fear from it



why ? if someone is caught red handed with either the body in the boot of there car or in the act of murder WHY CANT WE HANG THEM

wtf is wrong with your thinking that its not right to take a life if that life taken is evil and twisted


seems to me you have got something to hide here ?

ps i would do this to the peadophiles caught too

as for misjudgjing me ?? was i caught with the smoking gun in my hand and a body in my boot

get a grip some crimes are very easily solved and some criminals even come forward through guilt and admit there crime

HANG EM HIGH PUBLICLY

 

[hermes]

i really think you lot that dont want the death penalty have something to fear from it

Yes I have something to fear from it. I fear that if we have the death penalty then we are a society of killers. You yourself admit that killing is wrong.

 

[masona]

i really think you lot that dont want the death penalty have something to fear from it

Killing is not the answer, it put you on the same level as a murderers.

What's wrong with locking them up for life?