I see your point. After all, what better way is there to spend your time than creating a user name just for the the purpose of anonymously criticising someone?Have you guys got nothing better to do with your lives?
I see your point. After all, what better way is there to spend your time than creating a user name just for the the purpose of anonymously criticising someone?Have you guys got nothing better to do with your lives?
I see your point. After all, what better way is there to spend your time than creating a user name just for the the purpose of anonymously criticising someone?
I see your point. After all, what better way is there to spend your time than creating a user name just for the the purpose of anonymously criticising someone?Have you guys got nothing better to do with your lives?
You'd better believe it.
I see your point.
Its doing the rounds in emails at the mo but just wondered where the source for it was from in order to validate it rather than some mock up done with Word or the like.
Of course it isn't valid. Even if IFF data didn't correctly identity a police radar gun, and even if the vernacular of the letter's content weren't all wrong, the idea of a Tornado missile system needing manual intervention to prevent launch over a peaceful homeland is too ridiculous for anyone to believe....just wondered where the source for it was from in order to validate it rather than some mock up done with Word or the like.
And there have been numerous variations on the same theme starting way back when: http://www.snopes.com/horrors/techno/radar.asp.Of course it isn't valid