MP's could Steal Brexit...

[Doppleganger]

How hard is that for you to understand?

Can we use the analogy of ordering a pizza?
You are about to prepare your dinner, as are the rest of the inhabitants of that house. You have a larder full of groceries, but some of you fancy something different. About half of you fancy something from the larder, the other half of you fancy a pizza. It is a straight choice, pizza or something out of the larder. Whatever is decided you all have to accept it.

Collectively you choose the pizza.
You phone up the pizza shop and order some pizzas but you don't specify which ones, you leave it to the pizza shop's discretion. The shop does some average pizzas, trying to please everyone, just tomato and cheese so that the contents fits the description. There was no suggestion that the pizzas could be refused when they were ordered. They've been ordered, they must be accepted.

When the pizzas arrive, you don't like them, but it's the only ones that the pizza delivery has.
You can choose to accept those pizzas, or go without.
Some may want to accept them, grudgingly. Others don't want them, and prefer to go without, perhaps hoping that there might be other options coming along, especially when some try to persuade you that there are other options.
Requesting that the pizza delivery returns with another option is out of the question, it's his/her last delivery and he/she are on their way home, and the shop will be shut by the time he/she gets there.

Fortunately, you have a larder full of other nice things to eat.

Whatever is decided is binding on you all.
What do you do?

 

[durhamplumber]

Can we use the analogy of ordering a pizza?
You are about to prepare your dinner, as are the rest of the inhabitants of that house. You have a larder full of groceries, but some of you fancy something different. About half of you fancy something from the larder, the other half of you fancy a pizza. It is a straight choice, pizza or something out of the larder. Whatever is decided you all have to accept it.

Collectively you choose the pizza.
You phone up the pizza shop and order some pizzas but you don't specify which ones, you leave it to the pizza shop's discretion. The shop does some average pizzas, trying to please everyone, just tomato and cheese so that the contents fits the description. There was no suggestion that the pizzas could be refused when they were ordered. They've been ordered, they must be accepted.

When the pizzas arrive, you don't like them, but it's the only ones that the pizza delivery has.
You can choose to accept those pizzas, or go without.
Some may want to accept them, grudgingly. Others don't want them, and prefer to go without, perhaps hoping that there might be other options coming along, especially when some try to persuade you that there are other options.
Requesting that the pizza delivery returns with another option is out of the question, it's his/her last delivery and he/she are on their way home, and the shop will be shut by the time he/she gets there.

Fortunately, you have a larder full of other nice things to eat.

Whatever is decided is binding on you all.
What do you do?

Analogy of ordering a pizza??? ROFL

 

[Notch7]

Can we use the analogy of ordering a pizza?

No

 

[SammyInnit]

Can we use the analogy of ordering a pizza?

No.

 

[Doppleganger]

When the pizzas arrive, you don't like them, but it's the only ones that the pizza delivery has.
You can choose to accept those pizzas, or go without.
Some may want to accept them, grudgingly. Others don't want them, and prefer to go without,
Whatever is decided is binding on you all.

Analogy of ordering a pizza??? ROFL

No

Obviously, when the pizzas arrive, a subsequent vote is needed to decide the next course of action.
Otherwise you proceed on the basis of your original decision and you all have to go with the unacceptable pizzas!
Or did that little issue escape your attention?
Or did you not have a suitable argument against it?

 

[durhamplumber]

Obviously, when the pizzas arrive, a subsequent vote is needed to decide the next course of action.
Otherwise you proceed on the basis of your original decision and you all have to go with the unacceptable pizzas!
Or did that little issue escape your attention?
Or did you not have a suitable argument against it?

Rofl

 

[durhamplumber]

Requesting that the pizza delivery returns with another option is out of the question, it's his/her last delivery and he/she are on their way home, and the shop will be shut by the time he/she gets there.

Are you on the magic mushrooms for FEB

 

[durhamplumber]

Obviously, when the pizzas arrive, a subsequent vote is needed to decide the next course of action.

Really.Why is that obvious?

 

[SammyInnit]

What am I reading

 

[JohnD]

Dum plum voted for a pizza, but was under the impression that he would still be able to eat curry and chips.

 

[Notch7]

poor chap is missing a vital point:

pizzas are individual, there is no need for sharing

 

[ban-all-sheds]

What data have you seen that conflates not wanting the deal on the table with not wanting brexit at all?

People voted to leave.

We are leaving.

They voted to leave, therefore they voted for us leaving.

They were not voting for, or against, any particulars of any deal because they were not asked about those, and there were no such options on the ballot paper.

Over and over and over again you and your fellow travellers have shouted down anybody who tried to say that people who voted to leave did so in ignorance of what it would actually mean. Over and over and over again you and your fellow travellers have insisted that of course you knew what you were voting for, and that in a democratic exercise a majority of people voted for what they wanted and because they were in a majority everybody else had to stop moaning.

Yougov polls suggest the usual shift in opinion similar to movement over the last 10 years but nothing to suggest brexiteers by and large don't want brexit. It's the deal they don't want.

This is what you voted for.

You cannot, now, say that you didn't vote for it because you don't like it. I you don't like it then you should not have voted for it in the first place.

Stop moaning.

 

[durhamplumber]

People voted to leave.

We are leaving.

They voted to leave, therefore they voted for us leaving.

They were not voting for, or against, any particulars of any deal because they were not asked about those, and there were no such options on the ballot paper.

Over and over and over again you and your fellow travellers have shouted down anybody who tried to say that people who voted to leave did so in ignorance of what it would actually mean. Over and over and over again you and your fellow travellers have insisted that of course you knew what you were voting for, and that in a democratic exercise a majority of people voted for what they wanted and because they were in a majority everybody else had to stop moaning.



This is what you voted for.

You cannot, now, say that you didn't vote for it because you don't like it. I you don't like it then you should not have voted for it in the first place.

Stop moaning.

You moaning,not me

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Pretty well everybody says "no-deal would be the worst possible option."

Bit late, now, for the 17,410,742 people who voted for that to say they don't want it.

The Quitters have been saying "May's deal would be worse than staying in the EU."

17,410,742 quitters said leave, so we are leaving. How we leave, what deal we negotiate for our ongoing relationship etc were not things they concerned themselves about when they voted.

 

[JP_]

How can something be stolen that does not exist yet