New Sentence Game.

IM ......as the game has no rules

that's the point Susie, it DOES have rules.... and the main one is that you have to make a sentence from the letters of the last word in the previous sentence.... not an approximation of the last word !!!!! :rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
IM ......as the game has no rules

that's the point Susie, it DOES have rules.... and the main one is that you have to make a sentence from the letters of the last word in the previous sentence.... not an approximation of the last word !!!!! :rolleyes:
Quite correct imamartian, but the question begs, how far back do you go?
if the error has not been spotted by the previous three contributors, then in my opinion to keep the game moving, the last entry should be valid.
Can we all agree on this?

Wotan
 
IM ......as the game has no rules

that's the point Susie, it DOES have rules.... and the main one is that you have to make a sentence from the letters of the last word in the previous sentence.... not an approximation of the last word !!!!! :rolleyes:
Quite correct imamartian, but the question begs, how far back do you go?
if the error has not been spotted by the previous three contributors, then in my opinion to keep the game moving, the last entry should be valid.
Can we all agree on this?

Wotan

So that's why i said the current page (which might be one entry) plus the last page.... which might equate to a day, or an hour or 3 minutes.....

and if everyone stepped up their game, there'd be less need for this kind of post !!!

(apart from you Bolo, who get's an honourary memebership!! ;) )
 
Sponsored Links
wotan said:
if the error has not been spotted by the previous three contributors

(So, to clarify, we have a mistake:

cat:

can't open tin (wrong)

tin:

try it not (correct)

not:

not a tin (correct)

tin:

try it now (correct)

That's three valid sentences in a row so the word "tin" from the incorrect sentence "can't open tin" has to stand. :cool: :cool: :cool:

OK, I'll go along with that but here's another question. You go back to correct a mistake and find that the erroneous sentence was based on a word from yet another mistake. :eek: :eek: :eek: Do we check back even further or do we agree that only the most recent mistake can be corrected?)
 
not:

not a tin (correct) :eek:

SC
refer back to page 390465
paragraph 46b
item no 462
ref par: who the hell made up the rules
section 498d
ref par: who the hell cares
sub section 42/a/d46/98/65
:LOL: :LOL:

Just thank god Saturday has an S in it :LOL:


dancers

doing a naught can-can.... extremely raunchy showtime :eek:
 
Susiejb said:
Just thank god Saturday has an S in it :)

(As does Sunday
cloud9.gif
)

experiences:

extreme xenophobia provoked exceptional reactions in Eritreans normally considered eminently sensible
 
abounds

astonishing beauty, obviously uninhibited nature......desirable surroundings
 
not:

not a tin (correct) :eek:

SC
refer back to page 390465
paragraph 46b
item no 462
ref par: who the hell made up the rules
section 498d
ref par: who the hell cares
sub section 42/a/d46/98/65
:LOL: :LOL:

Just thank god Saturday has an S in it :LOL:


dancers

doing a naught can-can.... extremely raunchy showtime :eek:



glad we sorted that out then !!! :eek: :eek:

you take it all too personally Susie...

it doesn't matter whether the mistake was one post ago, or one hundred posts ago... imagine this...

the word tangent.... 100 pages ago,

and the current word is slipper

someone puts "tench and rudd get extremely netted trawler"... for tangent which is wrong (targent) and is spotted 6 months later...when slipper is the current word...

does it really matter that the current word changes from slipper to tangent? :?: :?: no, it doesn't. Does it stop the flow of the game? :?: :?:

No it doesn't. But what it does do, is it maintains the one and only rule we all agree on !!!! which is an accurate sentence. So just stop arguing, and any beep spotted whenever changes the current word....

You can't disagree with that can you Susie? Wotan?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top