“Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither.”With anything man made there will always be mistakes and mischief makers but we must not let it interfere with progress and the greater good.
“Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither.”With anything man made there will always be mistakes and mischief makers but we must not let it interfere with progress and the greater good.
Life LAL,,not liberty.“Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither.”
They could make a law that says people must download it onto all mobile phones.
Which is no excuse for building something deliberately less secure and more open to abuse. They're having to work harder to make their variant work rather than using the one that's built using the tools Google and Apple have provided.With anything man made there will always be mistakes and mischief makers but we must not let it interfere with progress and the greater good.
tools Google and Apple have provided
They're having to work harder to make their variant work
Which is no excuse for building something deliberately less secure and more open to abuse. They're having to work harder to make their variant work rather than using the one that's built using the tools Google and Apple have provided.
If someone tests positive then their phone posts its (randomly generated) ID publicly. Everyone else's phones can check that list to see if they've encountered it. If your phone finds a match on the public list with one that's on your phone then it tells you. It's a very scalable and abuse resistant approach.Still don't understand how the Google and Apple apps work, presumably they text people who the phone has logged they have been in close contact with, which of course is logged by the phone provider and stored in a database?
Because they've (NHSX) said so in blog posts. Apple phones in particular will stop broadcasting aggressively when the phone screen isn't on and showing the app. The Apple/Google version is allowed to keep broadcasting.How do you know?
Nice bit of contextomy there.“Those who give up liberty for security deserve neither.”
Nice bit of contextomy there.
If someone tests positive then their phone posts its (randomly generated) ID publicly. Everyone else's phones can check that list to see if they've encountered it. If your phone finds a match on the public list with one that's on your phone then it tells you. It's a very scalable and abuse resistant approach.
As I understand the UK version it pushes the IDs of all the other phones it has encountered to the NHS server. That means that if you can de annonimise the IDs then you can quickly build a social map. Which has a lot of potential for misuse.
Posts it, how? via a text message presumably, which is traceable.