- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,141
- Reaction score
- 2,394
- Country
Oh so what your saying is yes it is true
Yes, for a limited number of people. Not what your dishonest link implied at all.
Oh so what your saying is yes it is true
the link implied nothing you have already proved twice you have picked it up wrong now a third timeYes, for a limited number of people. Not what your dishonest link implied at all.
Here's some for you: ?????????????????https://mobile.twitter.com/i/web/status/1479468595998601220
??????????? more and more question marks?????????
the link implied nothing you have already proved twice you have picked it up wrong now a third time
i must have missed the bit were it says ALL residentsHere it is "The administration is hoping that after telling residents to get four different shots, two Pfizer BioNTech jabs and two doses of the Chinese Sinovac, the fifth time will be the charm."
I must have missed the "limited to specific groups" bit.
i must have missed the bit were it says ALL residents
Priceless
they are not needed
Corrected for you...The govt have to pay out for vaccines
The govt have to pay out for LFT
The govt have to pay out for furlough
That debunks every “cash cow” argument
Perhaps you should go and have a lie down, you are awfully confused.Has your Aricept prescription run out
You never did carry on outperform conversation regarding IQ,s
so when our government initially said residents to get the vaccine you took that as the entire population , really ! i never took you as that naiveIf a report said "residents are being offered a vaccine", why on earth would you not think it was for all?
The implication was clear, and wrong.
What like notch proved his claims.
Corrected for you...
"The tax payer has to pay out for vaccines
The tax payer has to pay out for LFT
The tax payer has to pay out for furlough
government initially said residents to get the vaccine