If there is no connection to earth, where exactly are these leakage currents flowing?Screening, reducing problems caused by cumulative capacitance resulting in excessive leakage currents.....
If there is no connection to earth, where exactly are these leakage currents flowing?Screening, reducing problems caused by cumulative capacitance resulting in excessive leakage currents.....
That's obviously true but, as I have repeatedly said, the discussion appears to have been simply about the general undesirability of having 'unnecessarily earthed metal' around the place, regardless of whether it is the outer casing of a Class II electrical appliance or something totally non-electrical.The bath is not an electrical device though, so although it might be an interesting example of a conductive object, it is neither Class I nor Class II.
What on earth does that mean? You are surely not suggesting that the 'double or reinforced insulation' is not even able to withstand continuously the p.d. between supply voltage and earth, are you?Class II equipment is often not designed to withstand a continuous earth potential on its exposed metalwork ...
I don't really understand that, either. Where do I find the corresponding requirements in relation to the ability to "safely carry fault current" for the exposed-conductive parts of a Class I item?... and is not designed so that its exposed metalwork can safely carry fault current until a protective device can operate.
Why should I not suggest that?You are surely not suggesting that the 'double or reinforced insulation' is not even able to withstand continuously the p.d. between supply voltage and earth, are you?
In the appropriate product standard or basic standard, where else?I don't really understand that, either. Where do I find the corresponding requirements in relation to the ability to "safely carry fault current" for the exposed-conductive parts of a Class I item?
Indeed, when it comes to some of the class II things I've seen, I've had to wonder at just how good the double insulation really is. For example, I remember some years ago having a metal desk lamp, a cheap, modern replica of an older style adjustable lamp. It was supposedly class II, but after looking at the construction and how the wiring was routed I was concerned that the double-insulation might not actually last that long with movement. I rewired it with a 3-conductor cord and bolted an earth securely onto the metal base with a solder tag, and felt far more comfortable handling it afterward.It can similarly be said that a Class II appliance is only as safe as its "double or reinforced insulation" (which I presume is not infallible)
That's true in some situations, but consider something like a metal bathtub which has metal taps fitted on the wall above it, i.e. not bolted to the tub so as to provide metallic contact.A live bath will not come to any harm but it will not do you any good touching it.
... because it seems to imply that the Class II item could be diabolically dangerous?Why should I not suggest that?You are surely not suggesting that the 'double or reinforced insulation' is not even able to withstand continuously the p.d. between supply voltage and earth, are you?
In the absence of a relevant specific product Standard, I presume that the 'basic Standard' would be BS7671, and I haven't seen any such requirements in it. ... and, anyway, what are these exposed-c-ps that could not safely carry fault current until a protective device operated - aluminium foil, perhaps??In the appropriate product standard or basic standard, where else?I don't really understand that, either. Where do I find the corresponding requirements in relation to the ability to "safely carry fault current" for the exposed-conductive parts of a Class I item?
Through any other path to earth which is provided by connection or contact with the units concerned.If there is no connection to earth, where exactly are these leakage currents flowing?Screening, reducing problems caused by cumulative capacitance resulting in excessive leakage currents.....
Well it darned well should be! If you are seriously suggesting that some metal-cased class II device might suffer some sort of insulation breakdown if the case ends up earthed, then I would have severe misgivings as to its double-insulation properties and therefore its safety.Class II equipment is often not designed to withstand a continuous earth potential on its exposed metalwork,.
No, it implies that the item, like all electrical equipment and appliances, is designed to be used as specified by the manufacturer, not to be connected to some other potential.... because it seems to imply that the Class II item could be diabolically dangerous?Why should I not suggest that?You are surely not suggesting that the 'double or reinforced insulation' is not even able to withstand continuously the p.d. between supply voltage and earth, are you?
No, BS7671 is not a basic standard! It has nothing to do with product requirements, it is a standard for electrical installations. Relevant basic standards might be 61140, 60335 series, etc.In the absence of a relevant specific product Standard, I presume that the 'basic Standard' would be BS7671, and I haven't seen any such requirements in it. ... and, anyway, what are these exposed-c-ps that could not safely carry fault current until a protective device operated - aluminium foil, perhaps??
Indeed - What else is one to make of it?... because it seems to imply that the Class II item could be diabolically dangerous?Why should I not suggest that?
That the item is to be connected as specified by the manufacturer, not otherwise. Any item connected to the wrong potential can become dangerous.Indeed - What else is one to make of it?... because it seems to imply that the Class II item could be diabolically dangerous?Why should I not suggest that?
What if somebody takes that piece of metal-cased class II equipment and stands it on something which is earthed, or pushes it back against something which is earthed?No, it implies that the item, like all electrical equipment and appliances, is designed to be used as specified by the manufacturer, not to be connected to some other potential.
If the nature of the equipment is such that that is foreseeable then the manufacturer must take it into account in his design.What if somebody takes that piece of metal-cased class II equipment and stands it on something which is earthed, or pushes it back against something which is earthed?No, it implies that the item, like all electrical equipment and appliances, is designed to be used as specified by the manufacturer, not to be connected to some other potential.
Most equipment intended for hand-held use is Class II, and is only used for short periods.What if it's a piece of equipment intended to be used handheld?
Won't you have to qualify supposedly?In the event of some external fault raising the potential on the pipework and the taps significantly, if you were sitting in the water and reaching out for one of those taps, would you rather the bathtub was at the same potential or that it was supposedly isolated from earth,A live bath will not come to any harm but it will not do you any good touching it.
An extraneous-c-p do you mean?but in reality almost certain to have some sort of earth potential on it, even if through a relatively high resistance of the building structure?
I really can't buy that argument. If a Class II item could not be relied upon to withstand supply p.d. between its internal parts and the outside of it's casing, then is simply would not be safe.No, it implies that the item, like all electrical equipment and appliances, is designed to be used as specified by the manufacturer, not to be connected to some other potential.... because it seems to imply that the Class II item could be diabolically dangerous?
No, but if the concept of Class II is to believed, there would be no need for them to - since there should be no way that fault current could flow through through those exposed parts.Would you expect the manufacturer of an item of Class II equipment to test the exposed metal parts for fault current withstand?
This seems to be getting plain silly. We're not talking about connecting equipment designed for 12V to 230V, or equipment designed for 230V to 1000V - we're talking about the outer casing of something allegedly safe (and safe to touch) coming into contact with earth potential, a potential which is ubiquitous within almost all premises. If an item becomes "dangerous" under those circumstances, it is simply a dangerous item.That the item is to be connected as specified by the manufacturer, not otherwise. Any item connected to the wrong potential can become dangerous.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local