For or against?
Not heard of it?
Not heard of it?
Mottie & dense13.Who decides what 'disinformation' is?
If it ever reached a stage where sites such as this were legally obliged to ask members or prospective members to verify their ID (e.g. through provision of passport and/or bank card details) I doubt I'd remain a member.
I would also question how securely the data is held and so on.
This sites hosted via Amazon Web Services (AWS)I have to agree with diy_fun_uk
And as its a global platform and a lot of the forums i'm a member / moderator are US based - they have no durastriction , and I suspect like the gambling websites - when tried to control - they just moved out of the country , same as a lot of finacial organisations moved headoffice to a european country during brexit - even though the majority of the employees stayed in UK the entity moved - not sure how that was all done - just that it was
I have no idea where a website i look after is actually hosted - is it where the company is located or the website ??? Not read the details of the proposal
as it keeps getting delayed anyway
But like GDPR , loads of things you can nolonger do - that actually can enhance customer experience , I know when i signed up for a service and was on a phone call - they asked me not to OPT out -as that meant they could not send me details of the service i just applied for !!!!!!!! that was the early days
Perhaps they can join with the Police's hate crime division, who are equally inundated with dealing with important crime on Twitter and FBI can see Ofcom being overwhelmed with complaints and needing more staff.
You agree that more police are needed?Perhaps they can join with the Police's hate crime division, who are equally inundated with dealing with important crime on Twitter and FB
The dangers of removing or reducing regulation can produce some undesirable and unpredictable results.I think we can have no doubts about the state of the internet if everyone's speech became unrestricted.