They lost pages ago.Ah, so selective quoting in an attempt to defend the indefensible...
You and nosenothing have lost the argument as you fully know!
They just can’t admit it. Sad really.
They lost pages ago.Ah, so selective quoting in an attempt to defend the indefensible...
You and nosenothing have lost the argument as you fully know!
Amazing how many times you twist and turn, but you still wont admit you are simply wrong!Nonsense.
Correct.
Correct. I have never stated anything different.
The truth....
Disconnection is rare.
The processes leading up to disconnection are the same for both meters.
You are no more likely to be disconnected or switched with either meter.
Have you posted the figures yet?You and nosenothing have lost the argument as you fully know!
LEADING up to that point, yesas in when the meter is ACTUALLY about to be disconnected
But it’s easier to turn the gas off with a SMThe processes leading up to being cut off are the same for both meters.
You are no more likely to be switched or cut off with either meter.
So leading up to that point of meter actually just about to be disconnected IS different . Glad we agreeLEADING up to that point, yes
He’ll be stuck in the loop soon.So leading up to that point of meter actually just about to be disconnected IS different . Glad we agree
So gov decides smart meters are a good idea from consulations. The drive for them is down to bills, no meter readers and demand monitoring for the electric power generators. Those need regular readings at some rate or the other. Daily wouldn't be much use to them.So there’s still the issue of access for a lot of dumb meters.
I'm surprised you've agreedSo leading up to that point of meter actually just about to be disconnected IS different . Glad we agree
About this...but you still wont admit you are simply wrong!
...not in the slightest.The truth....
Disconnection is rare.
The processes leading up to disconnection are the same for both meters.
You are no more likely to be disconnected or switched with either meter.
You’re clearly missed my point.So gov decides smart meters are a good idea from consulations. The drive for them is down to bills, no meter readers and demand monitoring for the electric power generators. Those need regular readings at some rate or the other. Daily wouldn't be much use to them.
So as usual the gov passes things over to the companies who are involved and tells them to find a solution. Gas and electric are the same in this respect. Generators, suppliers and consumers. Gas is stored so there must be adequate amounts in storage. It's the suppliers that see the most gain so they finish up with the SM work and add what they want to the functionality. Ideally never any need to visit a meter.
I'm baffled as to why the anti SM morons can't read a simple sentence. Laughably, they revert to "but it's easier to disconnect with an SM" or "you don't need a warrant, blah, blah blah...", without actually reading what was posted.It's the point that's been made all along.
The processes leading up to
Took you a while, but well done.. actually cutting them off is, or may be, different
Disconnection is rare.
The processes leading up to disconnection are the same for both meters.
You are no more likely to be disconnected or switched with either meter.
Well 'boyo', you can carry on in your delusional state if you like...About this...
...not in the slightest.
Those are facts boyo. I'm waiting for you to dispute them (he won't, he can't).
Why are you conflating 2 (or more) different points ?Well 'boyo', you can carry on in your delusional state if you like...
It gives those with the power of reason to have a good laugh
Do you also say that 'load management' to individual households or groups of households won't ever happen with smart meters?
Thankyou.Well 'boyo', you can carry on
...he won't he can't.Disconnection is rare.
The processes leading up to disconnection are the same for both meters.
You are no more likely to be disconnected or switched with either meter.