Well, if they thought like me, I honestly thought it would be a clean break so to answer your question, all of 'em!how many of them voted for a no-deal?
Well, if they thought like me, I honestly thought it would be a clean break so to answer your question, all of 'em!how many of them voted for a no-deal?
I listened to it, live. Trump was tragic. I just hope the vote comes to the same conclusion.
There you go.I honestly thought it would be a clean break
how many of them voted for a no-deal?
Didn’t listen to anyone. I looked at the questions on the voting slip and chose my preference. I don’t care how it happens as it will sort itself out in time.So you didn't believe what Leave told you.
No deal will be a clean enough break for me.There you go.
You voted for something that was and is not possible.
it was always on the table, but our Government wasn't obliged to choose that option.
Remember our choices?
(known well before the referendum)
Described here as "WTO model" i.e. no treaty with the EU.
Why would we do that - Essex is not paying to subsidise the rest of the UK and the rest of the U.K. are not taking from Essex.A bit like Essex voting to leave the UK.
Likewise. It is the EU that has muddled the waters and dragged this out with impossible demands as warning to others who are waiting and watching how it ends. So yes article 50 was on the table as part of the no deal in that sense.Well, if they thought like me, I honestly thought it would be a clean break so to answer your question, all of 'em!
Then it follows that the UK would be better off without Essex.Why would we do that - Essex is not paying to subsidise the rest of the UK and the rest of the U.K. are not taking from Essex.
impossible demands