No the regs only require that a CPC is run to and terminated at each point point in wiring and each accesory. It doesn't require every cable to contain a CPC.
Thanks. Interesting - I obviously thought that it did! Maybe it's because of the way I've previously interpreted 'every point in the installation/wiring' - to include the length of the cable as well as its terminations. Having a CPC obviously does increase the probability of a protective device operating if the cable is penetrated.No the regs only require that a CPC is run to and terminated at each point point in wiring and each accesory. It doesn't require every cable to contain a CPC.
No he wasn't. It was just another sentence under the regulation which can also be confirmed by the poor grammar as well as looking at the regulation..That is just a comment from someone - not the regulations.Whith multicore cables such as flex, or SWA, it is allowed to oversleeve the exposed core another colour.
What is it that makes that correct rather than that with which you seem to disagree?
The person in question was quoting the regulations.
No he wasn't. It was just another sentence under the regulation which can also be confirmed by the poor grammar as well as looking at the regulation..That is just a comment from someone - not the regulations.Whith multicore cables such as flex, or SWA, it is allowed to oversleeve the exposed core another colour.
What is it that makes that correct rather than that with which you seem to disagree?
The person in question was quoting the regulations.
If you really think that a belief by others that you should be competent to do electrical work before plunging in is a sign of egocentrism in them then I beg you to give up doing any more such work because you are barking mad and too f*****g thick.
No he wasn't. It was just another sentence under the regulation which can also be confirmed by the poor grammar as well as looking at the regulation..That is just a comment from someone - not the regulations.Whith multicore cables such as flex, or SWA, it is allowed to oversleeve the exposed core another colour.
What is it that makes that correct rather than that with which you seem to disagree?
The person in question was quoting the regulations.
I don't follow the point you're making. The guy did quote regulation 514.4.2. He interpretted it in his own words below yes, but it's already been agreed in this thread you can infact use the CPC in multicore cables for other purposes.
He quoted the regulation and then followed it with a wrong statement.I don't follow the point you're making. The guy did quote regulation 514.4.2. He interpretted it in his own words below yes,
You mean one person has said what you want to hear.but it's already been agreed in this thread you can infact use the CPC in multicore cables for other purposes.
In any case would you, to satisfy your obsession with sleeving CPCs, prefer to install cables in parallel rather than do it properly?
I'm not sure I understand your point - back in early 2011, I was also a pretty new member of the forum. I think you'll find that the reason you and I got treated differently was because of our respective 'attitudes'!You obviously think it's acceptable to scorn and berate new members.
I found this thread below, which I hope JohnW2 doesn't mind me posting, but it details using the G/Y core for live, which is potentially dangerous.
//www.diynot.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=273240
And your exact response was 'You're a very naughty boy.' No big spiel about how JohnW2 is incompetent and he should learn before doing etc.
I find that really telling.
Hopefully that is true from everyone's point of view. Frankly, you don't need any regulations for that one - it's just common sense.From a 'sparkie' point of view. A bare conductor in a T+E/3C+E is the cpc. No other use. End of.
In many senses unfortunately, all these threads (back to my one in early 2011, and probably earlier) have ended up having to concede that it is allowed. Per BS7671, sleeving at the ends is an acceptable way of "identifying" a cable core, and (for multicore cables) all the regs say is that the G/Y colour must not be used to identify anything other than a CPC - in other words, a G/Y oversleeved with brown is acceptably identified as a live core. However, the point we keep coming back to is that, although oversleeving a G/Y with brown is allowed (even if 'orrible), the requirement for a CPC is nearly always going to render that an unusable approach, except in very rare circumstances (e.g. two 'parallel cables', just one of them carrying the CPC, as recently mentioned by RF).A multi core flex.- If one of the flexes has a generic sleeving of green/ green/yellow its intention is to indicate its a cpc. End of. No over sleeving in your chosen sky blue pink tape is allowed.
What I find really telling is that you are either genuinely too stupid to understand what I wrote or are for some inane reason just pretending to be.I find that really telling.
Bla bla bla
Thanks JohnW2 for putting me right on the second para of my post. To save repeating, I've edited your response to mine as a wee smiley
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local