Pme or earth rod

This seems to be a subject open to interpretation and everyone has their own views was just wondering if taking a supply in swa to an outbuilding and using an earth rod does it make a difference how you earth the sheath earth rod end at outbuilding or pme end at house personally can't see a problem with either option
 
Sponsored Links
if taking a supply in swa to an outbuilding and using an earth rod does it make a difference how you earth the sheath earth rod end at outbuilding or pme end at house personally can't see a problem with either option
You have not thought about it then?

You must earth the armour at the supply end in order to afford protection for the cable by the fault current device in the house and if you do TT it then the armour must be isolated at the outbuilding.

Therefore if the cable or armour is suitably sized for earthing and bonding there really is no point installing TT arrangements.
 
Can you combine the armour and a core to make it large enough for bonding?

IE a 6mm SWA cables armour isnt big enough to act as a bonding conductor, nor is the 6mm conductor itself, but could the armour and a conductor be used together?

Also this table:

http://www.earthingnuts.co.uk/pdf/pvc_xlpe.pdf

Suggests PVC - PVC cable has more armour than XLPE-PVC cable? Is that correct?
 
Sponsored Links
Therefore if the cable or armour is suitably sized for earthing and bonding there really is no point installing TT arrangements.
True - IF one's only concern relates to extraneous-c-ps in the outhouse. Indeed, by the same argument, one would not consider TTing the outhouse if it had no extraneous-c-ps.

However, as I've been saying, some people have other concerns.

Kind Regards, John
 
Therefore if the cable or armour is suitably sized for earthing and bonding there really is no point installing TT arrangements.
True - IF one's only concern relates to extraneous-c-ps in the outhouse. Indeed, by the same argument, one would not consider TTing the outhouse if it had no extraneous-c-ps.
Yes, my complete answer was worded in response to the OP who wrote:

"This seems to be a subject open to interpretation and everyone has their own views was just wondering if taking a supply in swa to an outbuilding and using an earth rod does it make a difference how you earth the sheath earth rod end at outbuilding or pme end at house personally can't see a problem with either option."

However, as I've been saying, some people have other concerns.
They do but are they valid in 'usual/normal' circumstances?
 
However, as I've been saying, some people have other concerns.
They do but are they valid in 'usual/normal' circumstances?
That depends upon what you mean by 'usual/normal' circumstances. The only really 'serious' risk associated with exported PME earths that seems to twist some knickers only arises with a 'lost supply neutral' - which I would call neither 'usual' nor 'normal'. However, as I have described, in that extremely rare situation, there are theoretically some things to twist the knickers of those who are so inclined, even in the absence of any extraneous-c-ps.

Kind Regards, John
 
No, I meant usual/normal sized property where an extension could easily reach to the same distance as the shed/garage.
 
No, I meant usual/normal sized property where an extension could easily reach to the same distance as the shed/garage.
Oh, I see. Well, certainly in my case, my extension reel will reach any of the outbuildings in my garden - and, as I wrote earlier today, I think that any export of a PME earth outside of the house's equipotential zone carries similar (tiny) theoretical risks - whether the 'export' is by means of an extension lead, buried SWA connected to an 'electrical installation' in an outhouse, a metal soil pipe, a copper-plumbed 'outside tap' or whatever.

Your 'extension lead criterion' could presumably be used as an argument for not bonding extraneous-c-ps in an outhouse which had an 'electrical installation'?

Kind Regards, John
 
Oh, I'm sorry.
I'm not being clear; I meant if you had a house extension built which could be as far from the supply as a shed or garage.
 
Oh, I'm sorry. I'm not being clear; I meant if you had a house extension built which could be as far from the supply as a shed or garage.
Oh Dear - we're doing well at talking at cross-purposes this evening :) Yes, looking back, I can see that interpretation of what you wrote!

But it's surely not just about distances - as I said, it's all about taking a PME earth outside of the equipotential zone. If one built an extension which reached three-quarters of the way down one's garden, 'overtaking' sheds as it did, the entire inside of that extension would surely be included as part of the house's equipotential zone?

Kind Regards, John
 
Precisely.
Whilst that sounds like agreement, I'm not actually sure what you are agreeing with!

I have certainly never suggested that distance is a relevant issue in this discussion. I know that eric does make a distinction on the basis of distance, but, as I understand it, that is a more subtle argument based on the likely extent of voltage fields in the ground due to PME earths and extraneous-c-ps bonded to them.

As far as I (my Devil's Advocate) am concerned, the tap or socket (into which a Class I appliance could theoretically be plugged) on the outside of the kitchen wall present similar risks (in the presence of a 'lost PME neutral') as does the electrical installation in a shed 40 metres away from the house. Do you agree?

Kind Regards, John
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top