Politicians don't get to choose which votes they respect

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
You tell me - you’re the one claiming them as facts. What’s your source?
A good guide for online sites is to see what this site says:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/full-fact-uk/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sky-news/
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news.

A huge chunk of so called Brexit facts are sourced from Open Europe -
Open Europe. Calling itself an independent think tank, which it is not, Open Europe does two exceedingly clever things to influence British press coverage of Europe. Its (admirably multi-national) team of young researchers reads the English-language, French, Dutch, Belgian, German and Nordic press every day, and translates and links to stories that show the EU in a bad light, in a daily press summary that has very wide circulation among political reporters. Secondly, they produce special reports that delve into the detail of EU legislation and the economics of the EU, and produce hack-friendly, pre-digested reports on how awful the EU is, which duly sail into the press.
 
Sponsored Links
A good guide for online sites is to see what this site says:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/full-fact-uk/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sky-news/
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news.

A huge chunk of so called Brexit facts are sourced from Open Europe -
Open Europe. Calling itself an independent think tank, which it is not, Open Europe does two exceedingly clever things to influence British press coverage of Europe. Its (admirably multi-national) team of young researchers reads the English-language, French, Dutch, Belgian, German and Nordic press every day, and translates and links to stories that show the EU in a bad light, in a daily press summary that has very wide circulation among political reporters. Secondly, they produce special reports that delve into the detail of EU legislation and the economics of the EU, and produce hack-friendly, pre-digested reports on how awful the EU is, which duly sail into the press.
Well done Notchy,,you passed the “cut and paste” test,,,but what exactly are you on about?
 
The sun is 93 and a bit million miles from Earth.
Light takes 8 and a bit minutes to cover the sun-earth distance,at approx 186,000 miles per second.
Facts Notchy,,,,The (UK) is doomed forever after Brexit,not fact,the MPs job is to keep all of us happy all the time,, not fact,The (UK) will never manage outside of the (UK),etc etc etc etc,,,,,complete and utter Bolox,,dreamed up by you,,not scientific fact at all,,,economic pseudo science,guess timates,,,
Crap you think will make us stop Brexit,it will not,ever.Do not keep quoting hyperthetical scenarios
as fact,makes you look like a berk.
 
You would think maybe Ellal might be pleased Ive changed my view. (n)
With your sudden change of heart (;)) you seem to want to get answers from quitters that they won't give...

A bit strange then that you clam up when asked similarly relevant questions...

A 'convenient conversion'?
 
With your sudden change of heart (;)) you seem to want to get answers from quitters that they won't give...

A bit strange then that you clam up when asked similarly relevant questions...

A 'convenient conversion'?


There are many crossroads on the 'road to Damascus'.
 
A bit strange then that you clam up when asked similarly relevant questions..

I dont clam up, Ive explained on a number of occasions.

I apologise if I am wrong, but the nature of your posts seem to be point scoring in nature rather than a serious interest in why Ive changed.
 
I dont clam up, Ive explained on a number of occasions.

I apologise if I am wrong, but the nature of your posts seem to be point scoring in nature rather than a serious interest in why Ive changed.
You have said that you have now realised that the relationship we have with the EU is more complex than you understood to be the case at the time of the referendum.

And yet you have a go at quitters (as do I) when they won't explain why they voted as they did, and what the benefits would be.

At some point you must have thought there was a benefit to leaving, so I'm just interested in the conversion process...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top