Prediction

K

knowall

Mistic spark has a prediction -





- within 2years, 18th edition, ring circuits will be outlawed. Radials only in the Uk !




:eek:
 
Sponsored Links
It's already here ...... spur on spur on spur.......... fed of course, from a fcu
:mrgreen:
 
Sponsored Links
Nothing wrong with the final ring system it is only people who fiddle with the system without testing their work who cause problems and what ever one does one can't stop DIY people from working outside the accepted skilled man's practice.

The problem with the ring is a failure is not make apparent with power loss and it requires testing however test the loop readings before starting and test the ring is intact while working on it then re-test loop readings once finished and we know the ring is intact however without those loop readings as one inserts the socket into the box should a wire become dislodged we would not know.

The ring is only a problem when coupled to a lazy-fair attitude to testing.
 
I'm assuming we're talking about the good-ol' British socket circuit ring main?

Closed ring mains themselves are a useful way of distributing power to multiple locations, and can significantly reduce the cable size needed to meet the requirements for the installation, especially if the load is known, but it is not yet understood how it will be distributed.
 
You cannot use a ring unless you have an idea of how the loads will be distributed.

With a radial it doesn't matter.
 
You cannot use a ring unless you have an idea of how the loads will be distributed.

With a radial it doesn't matter.

What about a ring using 4mm² cable ?
No need to know how the loads will be distributed, lower impedance on the supply and slightly higher integrity on the CPC, fault tolerant in that a single loose terminal on an un-used socket will not over heat as can happen with a radial.
 
What about a ring using 4mm² cable ?
There is no point.

No need to know how the loads will be distributed, lower impedance on the supply and slightly higher integrity on the CPC, fault tolerant in that a single loose terminal on an un-used socket will not over heat as can happen with a radial.
Because it would be two radials joined for no reason.
 
Two radials would mean two MCBs so it would not be two radials joined for no reason, it would be a ring.
OK - it would be two radials joined to save the cost and space of an MCB, and to provide less capacity than two radials.

Or it would be one radial brought back to the CU to use more cable and not provide any more capacity.


lower impedance on the supply
Enough to matter IRL?


fault tolerant in that a single loose terminal on an un-used socket will not over heat as can happen with a radial.
Why not?
 
There was a discussion some time back regarding a guy with garage + sheds. He didn't know what the load distribution was going to be, because he wasn't sure which shed he was converting to a 'garden office' in a couple of years. But he needed power to the garage, and the sheds for future-proofing.

Depending on the layout of his garden, the ring circuit may have provided the best solution for his particular problem. OK, you would have to do some additional volt drop checks for different scenarios, but that, and a bit of trench digging, would be the only disadvantages.
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top