We can dream the dream, think the unthinkable to while away the hours thoughThere's no point bleating on about removing people's human rights because we can't do it.
Part of being in the E.C. is that we adopted the act. We're stuck with it now.
Compare that to a 7 year old girl, pretty, playing with my best friend on a summers evening.
There's no point bleating on about removing people's human rights because we can't do it.
Part of being in the E.C. is that we adopted the act. We're stuck with it now.
Compare that to a 7 year old girl, pretty, playing with my best friend on a summers evening.
you've just proved my point exactly. We are talking about facts of law and you let emotion cloud your judgement, it's as if you are saying that pretty girls have more of a right to life than ugly ones. Could an ugly child be less 'valuable' than a pretty adult?
and if child victims should be shown more compassion that adult ones, why don't you apply the same rules to 10 year old murderers? Venables was just a sweet little 10 year old kid when he killed, he surely was too young to realise his actions, why do you want him dead along with Huntley who was mature enough to realise that his actions were wrong.
Could you kill a baby Hitler?
There's no point bleating on about removing people's human rights because we can't do it.
Part of being in the E.C. is that we adopted the act. We're stuck with it now.
There's no point bleating on about removing people's human rights because we can't do it.
Part of being in the E.C. is that we adopted the act. We're stuck with it now.
why shouldn't i 'bleat on' about things i feel strongly about? who are you to tell me not to ?
that's what really p155e5 me off about this site (and probably the whole of human nature)... i say what i feel, and others tell me what they think, and then tell me what i should think. I have not problem with you trying to convince me that you are right, but don't tell me what to think!!
There's no point bleating on about removing people's human rights because we can't do it.
Part of being in the E.C. is that we adopted the act. We're stuck with it now.
why shouldn't i 'bleat on' about things i feel strongly about? who are you to tell me not to ?
that's what really p155e5 me off about this site (and probably the whole of human nature)... i say what i feel, and others tell me what they think, and then tell me what i should think. I have not problem with you trying to convince me that you are right, but don't tell me what to think!!
At no point did I tell you what to think. You can think whatever you like.
I merely said we are stuck with it so it's pointless to say we should deprive other of their rights. I might not not like the Human Rights Act either but I still have to abide by it.
I hope that clarifies my position.
Why are we pathetic for arguing about the murderer of two small children?And that folks concludes this episode of Lord of the Flies' LIVE, next week we bring you...
Look at yourselves, how pathetic.