Random Tottenham riots!

[SALL2009]

Can’t believe what I’m reading. Do you guys not see the point in what ellal is saying? In the first reports, there was a gun shoot out between the police and the guy who got shoot. It has now emerged the guy didn’t actually shoot at the police. What’s to say the next revelation is that, there was no other gun involved?

The official story change a few times in Charles De Menezes case before the truth came out. So waiting for the facts doesn’t make ellal a do-gooder or a lefty, but jumping on conclusions without the facts will make you a Tvv@t.

 

[spacecat]

The trouble with knee jerk idiots is that they ARE knee jerk idiots

 

[sooey]

The point of the matter is that there is now one less scumbag to worry about......result.

 

[spacecat]

The point of the matter is that there is now one less scumbag to worry about......result.

Maybe maybe not .......but sadly you are still here

 

[sooey]

I wonder if the natives'll be restless again tonight.

 

[ellal]

I wonder if the natives'll be restless again tonight.

That might depend on the police...

 

[sooey]

I wonder if the natives'll be restless again tonight.

That might depend on the police...

Of course it will...
If they think they can get away with more robbing and looting under the guise of "legitimate protest" they'll be right in there. It's up to the police to be there to stop that sort of thing.

 

[LastMagicBean]

If they think they can get away with more robbing and looting under the guise of "legitimate protest" they'll be right in there. It's up to the police to be there to stop that sort of thing.

Absolutely spot on.

 

[snico]

Do some people actually think he has to fire his gun for the police to open fire?

He had a weapon, whether he used it or not we dont know yet. You have a handgun on your person and you scratch your head you will get shot!

A family member said "Please don't make this about my brother's life (the rioting), he was a good man."

Yes, good men carry hand guns on them

 

[Alarm]

Wait for the usual pictures of the "innocent good man" in a suit aged 8 going to church.

as above if he was a law abiding citizen he has no use for a gun full stop.
On the streets, before some liberal says guns are fine, yes in gun clubs and farms ect. Not the local chip shop.

 

[ellal]

I wonder if the natives'll be restless again tonight.

That might depend on the police...

Of course it will...
If they think they can get away with more robbing and looting under the guise of "legitimate protest" they'll be right in there. It's up to the police to be there to stop that sort of thing.

I'm with you on the 'looting under pretence' b*llocks...

What concerns me is will the police tell the truth, whatever that is?

But we now have a few scenarios, and whatever happens next may depend on the truth:

'Gangster' shoots at police, they shoot back and kill him

'Gangster' doesn't shoot at police, and itchy trigger finger cop kills said 'gangster' anyway, injuring him/herself or colleague in the process

'Gangster' doesn't shoot at police, and itchy trigger finger cop kills said 'gangster' anyway, and then puts a bullet in his radio to indicate he was shot at.

'Gangster' never showed a gun in the first place.


And where is the taxi driver in all this...why have we not heard a word from him/her?

 

[longdogs]

Nah...I was showing up a load of numpties on an internet forum...

ellal, the only person you have shown up is yourself.

That numpty list just keeps getting bigger....

Ellal,

please add my name onto your numpty list.

Thank you

 

[ellal]

Nah...I was showing up a load of numpties on an internet forum...

ellal, the only person you have shown up is yourself.

That numpty list just keeps getting bigger....

Ellal,

please add my name onto your numpty list.

Thank you

With pleasure...

Should I also add you to the f*ckwit list?...

 

[longdogs]

Can’t believe what I’m reading. Do you guys not see the point in what ellal is saying? In the first reports, there was a gun shoot out between the police and the guy who got shoot. It has now emerged the guy didn’t actually shoot at the police. What’s to say the next revelation is that, there was no other gun involved?

The official story change a few times in Charles De Menezes case before the truth came out. So waiting for the facts doesn’t make ellal a do-gooder or a lefty, but jumping on conclusions without the facts will make you a Tvv@t.

Do you not see the point? What has the police shooting someone got to do with full blown rioting and looting. I remember a few years ago, a white man was shot by police in Plumstead, south London, but it didn't result in the residents having a riot. They were pleased that a criminal had been deleted.

As for Charles de Menezes, a policeman aimed a gun at him which means 'stop' whatever language you speak. He chose to run so too bad.

 

[longdogs]

Nah...I was showing up a load of numpties on an internet forum...

ellal, the only person you have shown up is yourself.

That numpty list just keeps getting bigger....

Ellal,

please add my name onto your numpty list.

Thank you

With pleasure...

Should I also add you to the f*ckwit list?...

If the definition of f*ckwit is someone who is sick of watching this country slide down the sh*tter then yes please!